| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,034 |
|
|
New Member
United States
32 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1110 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7063 Posts |
As far as how the date looks, I'm leaning towards die flow lines...lets see what others say...As far as the mint mark all I know is that there are so many for that year and mint, so good luck matching it up....  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The lighting makes it difficult to see clearly. That leftover bit doesn't seem to curve enough.
Edited by Coinfrog
02/01/2021 3:35 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6606 Posts |
What is at question here?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1110 Posts |
Quote:
What is at question here? We're guessing just like you.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
Quote:
What is at question here? Well it's in the grading section - maybe he just wanted a grade   But then: Quote:
1943 Nickel Another Error? So who knows?  Edited by Rothery
02/01/2021 4:43 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1217 Posts |
My guess is the mint mark?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10284 Posts |
Looks like a reconditioned War Nickel to me in the second photo. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19205 Posts |
The nickel does look rather clean--wondering what the light source is/was for the photos.
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
Always best to remove coins from holders whenever possible before taking pictures. Also,please tell us your question in more detail. John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
1110 Posts |
Who need the OP, we're keeping ourselves entertained. |
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,034 |
|
Posted 02/01/2021 3:16 pm
