| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,157 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
512 Posts |
What do you think? Older coins didn't have as much definition on the robe, I don't think. Not sure if it's uncirculated and/or cleaned.  
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Are you showing us the same coins as you did a couple of days ago ? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
3 weeks ago I posted a 1918S. Close, but not the same coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19164 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6566 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
512 Posts |
Seller wants (and bills it as) uncirculated (choice), just FYI.
Hard to get a good deal on early Walkers, imo.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Certainly not a choice Unc. Surfaces look a bit lifeless, possibly over-dipped at one point. AU53
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2955 Posts |
 with everyone above (mid-AU), but to me, it does not look cleaned, it just looks lightly toned, and good eye appeal to my eyes.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I could go AU-53 straight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2334 Posts |
I'm guessing LDS with light to no details on her left leg. Probably dipped at some point and acetone soaked and worked on in an attempt to remove/minimize the carbon spots? I could see a straight grade of AU-53...I wouldn't pay UNC for it though. smat
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5190 Posts |
Old cleaning perhaps? I agree with a AU-53 grade. No way this is "choice".
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
its not Unc. AU53 maybe on a good day 55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Just shy of mint state. I'd put this one at AU-58.
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,157 |