| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,202 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95740 Posts |
I would think that a coin of a certain year (lets say 1940 and a proof nickel) that has a reverse device of a 1940 proof nickel, that it would NOT be an anomaly but just a standard 1940 Proof nickel. How does one explain this graded NGC coin and subsequent sellers justification of $1800.00 for it?   1940 PROOF Jefferson nickel 5C REVERSE OF 1940 NGC & CAC PF 67+ ebay item number: 133647731672
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
565 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
The seller can ask what ever they want and a buyer will pay what they are willing to pay,buyer beware. Nickels are not my area, but maybe it has to do with mintage figures, strong strike, condition rarity? No where does it say it is an error,it actually has the correct reverse for the year.It also has a CAC sticker. John1 
Edited by John1 06/23/2021 10:15 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19150 Posts |
I agree with John1--sellers can ask what they want and buyers are free to pay what they're willing to pay. The market is the market--warts and all.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95740 Posts |
Edited by Dearborn 06/23/2021 12:39 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
269 Posts |
1938 Jefferson nickels did have a different reverse (steps are wavy and less distinct) than the reverse released in 1939 and subsequent years. There are 1939 nickels with both versions of the reverse. I am not sure that also exists for 1940, so not sure what NGC is doing here...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
That's a pretty fair price. To clarify as to the 'error' there were 2 different reverse dies used to strike 1940 dated proof Jefferson nickels. One die had the reverse design of 1938 and the other dies had the normal reverse of 1940. Examples with CAC are even scarcer. In addition, this coin has better than average frosting on the devices. All in all the coin is priced fairly IMO. The 1940 Reverse of 1938 is quite scarce and more desirable, so NGC simply labeling the coin Reverse of 1940 is just to make clear which this coin is. This isn't slabbing getting out of control, this is why it is a thing. It protects uninformed buyers from being ripped off from a seller claiming their coin is something it isn't. As for the price, PR-67+ is a rather scarce grade with a pop of 39/17 combined PCGS and NGC.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95740 Posts |
Edited by Dearborn 06/23/2021 12:52 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
Quote: I cannot see such an extravagant price Reread my reply. The price is because of the grade and the BTA Cameo. In Proof-67+ it is pop 39/17, which is not a lot, and even less have CAC stickers, and even less of those have nicer cameo surfaces. That's why the price is as high as it is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5668 Posts |
The high price is due to the grade. The reverse of 40 is the more common proof variety, but the asking price is not much more than what 1940 PF67+ graded coins have sold for in the past.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95740 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95740 Posts |
So, Going by what was said up above, this 1940 Jeff Nickel is a steal then. It has the same grade and CAC sticker but graded by PCGS: EDIT: BUT it does not have the same shine or cameo as the first one.. so maybe the price is right? ebay item number: 114687155477
Edited by Dearborn 06/23/2021 4:30 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5668 Posts |
The PCGS coin is a PR67, not a PF67+, and it doesn't have nearly the eye appeal of the NGC coin. That being said, pricing for scarce coins in high grades is extremely variable, and as @ijn1944 indicated, the value is what a seller and buyer agree to.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95740 Posts |
ha! silly me.. I saw the '+' sign and focused on that... my mistake..
sometimes my brain will not kick in like it is supposed to...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
Quote: BUT it does not have the same shine or cameo as the first one.. so maybe the price is right? As Zurie stated, the difference comes to the  . A half point in grade can make a massive difference in price. The second coin you linked also has much poorer eye appeal as it is brilliant, not cameo.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,202 |
|