| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 1,667 |
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
What do you think on grade, and worth having sending in for grading?  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
To my eye the pasty images have tended to hide any very fine hairline scratches that may? be there. I certainly can't see any, and for the purposes of grading, I will assume that there aren't any.
On that basis, MS-66.
An actual hair appears in the background, but very fine hairlines that may on the coin are normally much finer than this.
Some luster is evident in the images, but for a 66 coin, the amount of luster on a 66 coin that has only a very light patina, or even no patina at all, should be very strong.
Despite well focussed images I feel that there is going to be a wide range of grading opinions.
Edited by sel_69l 08/28/2021 10:11 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18684 Posts |
based on these photos AU58 or MS63. I'm leaning AU58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
No way is it 66, its got lots of chatter to obverse and surfaces looking very dull. The reverse actually looks quite clean but I'd like to see more photos to see any scratches with a different lighting angle. From these photos it could be MS60 but looks to be AU58 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
There's a cloudiness to this one that is either hiding some marks, or just hurting the eye appeal. If it were mine, I'd start with an acetone bath, then possibly xylene. If all else fails, a VERY quick dip.
That said, I see a decent amount of light marks on the cheek, neck, and high points on the obverse. Possibly enough to warrant AU. But again, that surface haze is making it tough to judge.
I'm with panzaldi, AU58-MS63
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Gray, dull images make it difficult to evaluate this coin. I'll say AU-58 with a low confidence factor.
Edited by Coinfrog 08/28/2021 10:51 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
MS-61. Very heavy chatter on the cheek and dull surfaces.
Edited by fenton 08/28/2021 1:09 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19186 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
58 slider for me as well. Not worth the grading fee but still a nice example of a 121 year old coin....  and  to the CCF!!
Edited by dave700x 08/28/2021 3:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3659 Posts |
Nice looking AU-58. Very few contact marks, and only light evidence of circulation.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
62 Posts |
I tried more photos after a quick dip in acetone. Hope this helps.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Still at AU-58. Coin seems lifeless.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
62 Posts |
@coinfrog Lifeless? Just a flat dull surface?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Indeed, from what you have shown us. I do not mean to offend. Others may feel differently. 
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 1,667 |