| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,021 |
|
|
New Member
United States
25 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
187 Posts |
Good to see a buf with a "visible date" !!!! Not sure about the coin facts as I don't collect these but again, great to see one with a legible date! I'm sure the experts will chime in soon
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Not my area,but looks like a worn die issue to me. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Looks like a die crack that passes through FIVE CENTS, starting at the rim and passes all the way through the F.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
1913-D type 1 . Nice circulated Buff , I agree a die issue with the letters . 
|
|
New Member
 United States
25 Posts |
Ty, is that the line that connects the E to the C and so forth? What about the top lettering in OF AMERICA? is that Machine Doubling or double die?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Correct, runs through the lower part of CENTS, connects to the center of E and then runs through the upper part of FIVE. Die Deterioration Doubling on the upper part of USOA due to worn dies as others have mentioned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Extreme die wear. With the 'Five Cents' so small, that was the design on the the mound type 1 nickels.  The breakdown of the die that year was probably the reason for type 2 dies. A desirable coin to collectors.
|
|
New Member
 United States
25 Posts |
What would be a ball park grade for this coin and Should I send it in for grading? What are coins in this condition bringing?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
The change from Type 1 to type 2 was actually done to prevent FIVE CENTS from becoming worn beyond recognition from moderate wear. Recessing the denomination would prevent this.
I question the surface originality on this one. Later die state and strike weakness have left the details soft. IMO, that is what is causing the lack of horn detail, rather than wear. In mint state, this coin may have started without a full horn, or at least a barely complete one. Might also have a slight tapered planchet, rim weakness behind the buffalos rear leg. Difficult to tell from these pics.
This is part of what makes this series tough to grade. Without really seeing this coin in hand, it's difficult to say. May be a technical XF, with weakness due to strike and die state. The majority will likely call it VF. I'm having a hard time judging the surfaces on this one. May have been cleaned at some point as well. Either way, not worth the cost of grading, but an interesting example with great history.
|
|
New Member
 United States
25 Posts |
Thank you! I appreciate all of yalls time. I've had this coin for years,but haven't paid any detail attention to it until recently. I have no intention of selling it but I know some day it will be passed down and I would like as much info on it as possible so it's not considered "just some old coin". Thank yall very much!
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,021 |
|