| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,024 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
808 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34402 Posts |
@acag, it seems like you are most interested in our thoughts about the potential for this being a RPM so I'm going to move your thread over to a slightly different subforum. 
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1489 Posts |
What are you seeing above the 0 in the date and above E in LIBERTY? Pix are good but you have the coin in hand.
Edited by halfamind 04/27/2022 5:41 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Looks like a die chip, as above E in Liberty.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
that's sometimes called a "bar 0" on the date, it's caused by a die chip, and was surprising common during 1960
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
808 Posts |
Ok, what I was going for was the fact you have a nickel which survived circulation looking as good as it does. The small die chips I did see but I thought it was a candidate for an RPM. It seemed there was a second mint mark under the primary one. I placed it in a flip anyway. Regards.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
If that is in incuse mark on the mintmark, it maybe just damage on the mintmark, not a RPM. Try making an image with a normal mintmark side by side with this mintmark. If the mintmark is enlarged, it might be a minor RPM that is not listed. If the mintmarks are the same size, it maybe just a contact mark on a normal mintmark. Then compare it with other RPM sizes. Then you can see if it is/is not an example. That would be the best way to tell. I agree about the zero, being a die chip. It is not to the stage yet were is could be a Cud. There would need to be a rim to rim crack first to show that the die is starting to break down. If it were advancing, it would be taller than the rim/design. Its not at this point. Not the fields on the coin are showing a lot of die flow. So the die is aging so far with that chip starting to show.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Quote: that's sometimes called a "bar 0" on the date, it's caused by a die chip, and was surprising common during 1960  ,I have a couple of rolls of them collected in the early 60's . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
876 Posts |
So a RPM is definitely ruled out here? Chips for sure. But no chance for RPM? Please elaborate why not.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,024 |
|