If it wasn't part of the design, it would have to be a die chip.
Note it is raised, so the die had a void in that location. Thus a die chip.
If it were part of the design, all coins would look that year.
But all the ones struck by that die will show the same exact die chip.
Just a die event.
Why am I so sure? The dies are negatives. The coins are positives. So if something is raised on the coin, it would be a negative on the die. (a void) Thus part of the design broke off on that area, leaving a void. You are looking at a copy of that void. That is what the chipped off area looked like. Often we forget about the negatives and positives of the dies/hubs/coin design. If this were a continuing design, Something would have been done. But this was just a one in five designs for that year. So it was a temporary design. Thus no need to fix the issue. Now it is just a die event that
people get distracted of finding instead of the real collectables of the doubled dies. This definition would apply to any die chip on any coin. Just a void that developed on the die, making a raised area on the coins.
CoopHome:
What is the extra claw issue on the Alaska Design?
Edited by coop
05/03/2022 1:15 pm