| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,111 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
Hmm that isn't a rim clash I think.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
United States
56855 Posts |
If those came in a cello wrapped set, it looks like a cello sealing machine damaged coin. John1  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21631 Posts |
Has to be PMD of some sort. That couldn't happen during the striking of the coin. |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
616 Posts |
It was from a 2nd Gen mint set released in 1995. Wasn't in cello but a hard molded plastic coin sleeve glued into a card stock folder like display.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Like this..   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Quote:
That couldn't happen during the striking of the coin. The only possibility that comes to my mind is that a feeder finger could've almost cleared the striking chamber but the dies caught just the smallest corner of it.. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
That's great info Coop.but as I mentioned, the 1995 Mint Sets came in two different packaging styles, the normal cello envelope packs and a heavy card stock folder with the coins encapsulated in a pre molded hard plastic shell glued between the card stock and then slid into a slipcover.
I understand how the sealing machine for the cello packs could damage coins but these other mint set coins are slid into their proper spots and then the plastic shell is glued between the heavy card stock to make the folder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
97314 Posts |
I have never seen the card stock style offered by the mint before.. I may have to go looks into this type of packaging..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1498 Posts |
Was it repackaged by a non-gov't company, pulled from the mint-issues cello packs?
|
|
Moderator
United States
97314 Posts |
Quote:
Was it repackaged by a non-gov't company, pulled from the mint-issues cello packs? To be honest, that is what I'm thinking too but can't find anything stating otherwise. a google search of other sets like are indicating mint issue with no other name on it (that I can find) |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
So what year of the current coins were mint sets harder to get? (Hidden answer to this question in the blank space between the two visible posts.)
On the 1982 and 1983 mint sets, you have to order/go the the mints to get there sets. They were not sold as a pair of sets. So if you didn't have these sets to get as a purchase easily, the BU coins from those years are more desirable for collectors that buy mint sets to fill out their collections. So the Quarters/halves in the higher grades those years are still in demand. So hang on to these for future sales. A lot of collectors don't know this, so snag the best ones for future sales.
Hidden message above. Highlight that area to see the answer to this question?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7174 Posts |
JDRMCB Does that packaging have U.S. mint on it anywhere? Everything from the mint will have U.S. mint printed on it. I can't see it on that one. So that probably means it's a second party product. Then it could have been from the crimping machine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
616 Posts |
Quote:
JDRMCB Does that packaging have U.S. mint on it anywhere? Yes, here are the pics that will complete the view of the mint set packaging.    |
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,111 |
Posted 05/17/2022 06:47 am
