2002 D Roosevelt Dime Mint Error - Weak Strike Or ?

@tb, you know way more than I do about this stuff, but I don't see how reeding could be applied to the edge if there are no rims. My initial thought is that someone has ground down the rims, but I would be happy to be proved wrong.

PMD
I don't see how a coin struck in collar cannot have rims.
Even a weak strike would still show some of the rim.
Also a blank would not have any reeding.
There have been several like this posted where the rims
have been removed.

Interesting. When we see coins like this from other posters we almost always react with 'post-strike damage, ground down'. Hope others weigh-in.

When I originally looked at this one, I just used a loupe and the edges looked pretty much like a mint-created surface. Plus the weakness on the high points of the obverse and the upper torch on the reverse seemed to indicate a weak strike kind of issue. I am still not entirely sure, but I did put the edges under the scope and at magnification it does seem as if they show slight arcing lines instead of straight flow lines indicating that the edge was machined and not struck that way. So at this point, I think I agree with the above posts that the coin most likely was hit with a buffer or similar to smooth off the edges.

Thanks for the insight!

Note the flow lines are erased on the affected area. Looks altered to me.

We are seeing so many of these lately.
My guess is the new fangled side load clothes washers.

I think most all know dimes aren't my thing, so out of my zone when it comes to all things reeding. But here are images of the edge and rim area. Reeding seems pretty strong, but also seems like more copper and less cladding than one would expect. Makes me wonder how one could buff this much off the rim and not come down to copper?