| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,607 |
|
|
New Member
United States
27 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21605 Posts |
Not brand new, it is worn, looks like it has been plated.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95740 Posts |
Not a silver nickel - it was either heavily polished or plated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
Weight of the coin please. this coin is likely polished/plated after it left the mint, thus the shiny appearance.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19150 Posts |
Agree--appears to be polished/plated.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Same.  to the CCF!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I vote plated also . 
|
|
New Member
 United States
27 Posts |
It looks so well detailed. And corners are still sharp when you feel around them. 
|
|
New Member
United States
34 Posts |
Details are missing in hair of Jefferson and steps of building. Those surfaces get worn down with wear and circulation
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
a lack of detail on Monticello's steps of 1960s nickels is not a reliable indicator of wear since most business strikes of that decade lacked visible full steps when freshly minted, and some had none at all
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
You first Observe pic attract me. I took the picture to see the grains of the surface of the coin. This was a relative well circulated coin which was re-plated. Best circulated sign in the hairs. I look and I see the gains which only the plating give. Also the side of the coin show the plating, Same the Reverse. Here your pic adjusted: 
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,607 |
|