The next is a pitis teboh (central hole).
20mm dia - 1.06 grams
As far as I can tell it is a type 11, which the reference material shows as undated, yet I'm fairly certain the date is quite visible as AH1212.

This would fall again within the reign of Muhammad Budarin, yet the reference material puts it into the next sultan, Mahmud Badaruddin II (1804-21), AH1219=1804, "Masruf fi bilad Palembang 1219.
My two questions are
1. Is the date that I am seeing not a date?
2. Reading through the reference material, it is apparent that bungled dates were quite the norm. On example type 11.5, the date(?) is clearly IMO 1222. which would equate to around 1807, within Mahmud Badaruddin II's reign.
As this is a variation of the same coin type 11, could 11 and the others with 1212 be dated incorrectly?
Hope that makes sense.
Hopefully someone has already tackled this and will know the answer.
More pics to follow some other time.
20mm dia - 1.06 grams
As far as I can tell it is a type 11, which the reference material shows as undated, yet I'm fairly certain the date is quite visible as AH1212.

This would fall again within the reign of Muhammad Budarin, yet the reference material puts it into the next sultan, Mahmud Badaruddin II (1804-21), AH1219=1804, "Masruf fi bilad Palembang 1219.
My two questions are
1. Is the date that I am seeing not a date?
2. Reading through the reference material, it is apparent that bungled dates were quite the norm. On example type 11.5, the date(?) is clearly IMO 1222. which would equate to around 1807, within Mahmud Badaruddin II's reign.
As this is a variation of the same coin type 11, could 11 and the others with 1212 be dated incorrectly?
Hope that makes sense.
Hopefully someone has already tackled this and will know the answer.
More pics to follow some other time.
The Ox moves slowly, but the Earth is patient.























