| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 879 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
586 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
An RPD on a 1940 nickel? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8760 Posts |
Just a worn out die and circulation damage. Might be some die chips too, can't really tell though.
-makecents-
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34416 Posts |
@for sure there is some circulation wear. Can you please post the weight and a closeup on PLURIBUS? Thx.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not seeing anything special here.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21611 Posts |
Can't be a repunched date, the dates are part of the master die. Your right about the rest though, it is PMD.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96348 Posts |
never heard of an RPD before, the date is not punched like the mintmark, maybe an overdate. but that is not what you have here, just a well circulated nickel.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8760 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
I, too, see nothing unexpected for a circulated 1940 nickel
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
Edited by KerryKz 02/12/2023 11:44 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
586 Posts |
I knew what I meant. Overdate. Just don't quite have all the terminology. And it still looks just like a 9 over the 0 on that to me
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34416 Posts |
Ok yes looks like pluribus just took a hit too. I wanted to make sure you didn't have a Henninger nickel with a new date there.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Overdate stopped in 1908. All the devices on the coin's design is now on the whole die. The only way for devices to had two different dates is if it were hubbed with hubs from two different years. (Very rarely that this happens. Just a very few years) Mintmark were added to dies up 1989, then in 1990 forward the mintmarks are part of the design, no longer added as a separate step. The devices on your coin were flatten from circulation damage or vending machine damage. Not a mint error. Post strike errors. (Coin events that alter the coin) The marks on the fields are from die wear. They are called flow lines. What a flow line? When a coin is struck the planchet is smaller than the finished coin. To the metal is flattened/shaped/formed during the strike in one pressing. The dies form the coin, the collar contains the outside edge of the coin, the gutters form the rims. All done in less than a second. When this happens hundreds of thousands of times, the die start to show die wear/distortion and the coins keep a running record of the dies wear pattern as the dies age. These flow lines are often polished off the die, and this polishing alters the devices on the die. Thus because of doing the same thing up to a million times, the dies age. Thus that is what is causing what you are seeing between the devices on the fields. These are just die events. Not a premium for them as 54% can look like your coin on all the coins. So it is a common die event. A doubled die is a variety that is seen on the first coin forwards. Your coin was struck with a normal die that was aging. (Eventually the dies are retired and defaced and scrapped/or sold)     On the last image, the lines on the left side of the device are actually part of a doubled die that was noticed on that years coins. CoopHome: What are die flow lines? these are part of the normal die wear pattern of dies as they age. not a collectable, but are noticed, sometimes polished (face lift) and continued to be used until they are retired.
Edited by coop 02/12/2023 1:17 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
Excellent synopsis Coop! 
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 879 |
|