| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 1,659 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
Quote: Break out and resubmit? That is what I'm thinking, especially when the consensus falls around 64-65. Still would like opinions on what I might be missing wrt cleaning. Even if you didn't think it at first, 'oh ya' pointers would be great to know.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Ouch. Jeez. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It doesn't look close to a 66 to me. I understand you cannot capture the luster. Still, in these images I don't see near enough mint luster to go over Choice MS. I do see subdued "matte" looking surfaces at several locations. Look at this 66 example. https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin.../images/7188
Edited by BH1964 11/24/2024 2:18 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
599 Posts |
I can see some lines on the cheek where it looks like it was wiped. They're very faint but apparently not faint enough.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
I'll crack it and take pics tomorrow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7078 Posts |
wow...details...  .... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
Good call by all stating luster is an issue. Cracked and under scope, all the luster is impaired except close to devices. I've never dipped so have no idea what to look for but, given the lack of any micro scratches, I'll assume this is an over-dipped (dipped out) coin. So even though dipping is acceptable any coin taken to far is tagged cleaned by PCGS.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The impaired luster except close to devices is not from dipping. Dipping is not selective as it removes metal from the entire coin. If someone took something like eZest on a Q-tip, and cleaned the coin, then, it could get the impaired luster except close to the devices, and most likely it would leave wiping hair lines. My guess is there are some hair lines from the cleaning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5192 Posts |
Maybe the grader was in a very bad mood...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Quote: all the luster is impaired except close to devices Typical uncirculated coins do not have a difference in luster between the area close to the devices and the field area. This difference happens from circulation and cleaning. Cleaning hair lines often can not be seen from still photos or viewing the example through magnification. To view hair lines hold the coin between your thumb and index finger and put it under light and tilt the coin back and forth. Look at the fields as the fields are the easiest to spot hair lines. If the example has been wiped or cleaned the hair lines will change directions while tilting the coin. If your example does not display hair lines, I am not sure why the example was given Details Cleaned. The TPG's do not typically give an UNC dipped coin a details grade that still is displaying luster, but they will lower the grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
1502 Posts |
Will do Slider, thx
I swing a metal detector and have a knack for finding dirty old coins. Dirt coin restoration projects - https://www.prodetecting.com/restorationsDirt coin restoration blog - https://www.prodetecting.com/blog/ccawDirt coin dig videos - https://www.youtube.com/@prodetecting
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 1,659 |