Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2001 Lincoln Cent, Heavily Worn?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,325Next Topic  
Valued Member
JOE's Avatar
United States
164 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  3:13 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add JOE to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I just had a quick question on this odd cent I found, On the obverse, The bottom portion of the coin has been flattened, as well as the top of the coin on the other side.

I doubt this is a mint error, But i'd like to ask anyway. Did this happen in the mint, Or has this cent just seen too much wear?

2001-Lincoln-Cent,-Heavily-Worn?
2001-Lincoln-Cent,-Heavily-Worn?
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  3:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe struck through a blob of grease that had gotten both sides of the coin since the imperfections are opposite each other.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
188660 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  3:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree on it being grease or some other mint problem. Being that worn would mean exposed zinc since it is copper plated.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  4:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Or a thinned planchet? Hows the weight?
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  4:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with coop, I think it is a tapered planchet, i.e. thinner on one side than the other. Get an accurate weight, it should be a bit light if it is tapered.
Moderator
Learn More...
vermontensium's Avatar
United States
16679 Posts
 Posted 06/15/2009  6:36 pm  Show Profile   Check vermontensium's eBay Listings Check vermontensium's eCrater Listings Bookmark this reply Add vermontensium to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Look at the reverse rim. It's struck thru grease.
swcoin.ecrater.com
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 06/17/2009  10:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like a tapered planchet to me. They do have value, but as to how much I cannot answer.
Pillar of the Community
United States
2737 Posts
 Posted 06/17/2009  7:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mikediamond to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It is most likely a vertical misalignment (tilted die error). One of the dies was not quite parallel to the other. As a result, striking pressure was higher at one pole and quite weak at the opposite pole. The slow fadeout of the obverse design rim is one indicator (grease strikes usually show a strong design rim). A beveled rim/edge junction is retained, which is another indicator of low striking pressure. The reverse design rim is fairly well-developed next to the featureless area, which may be problematic. However, there may have been enough lateral expansion generated by the strongly-struck area to have pushed up a respectable design rim at the opposite ople. I have two tilted die errors on 2001 cents (one struck in-collar, the other broadstruck) and this looks very similar.

My diagnosis is tentative. Close inspection under a microscope and careful weighing is essential for a reliable diagnosis. Tilted die errors can look very similar to double-sided grease strikes and tapered planchet errors.
Error coin writer and researcher.
Edited by mikediamond
06/17/2009 10:55 pm
Rest in Peace
numismo's Avatar
United States
3039 Posts
 Posted 06/21/2009  03:01 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add numismo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great explaination Mike. Having informed opinions from you , Chuck and others on the many varieties submitted to the forum is what this community is all about. I'm constantly learning new things. Thanks to all.
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,325Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums