| Author |
Replies: 65 / Views: 5,299 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Bank Fraud? Fraud is a felony.. can they even black list anyone for that if you actually haven't been convicted in a court of law? Is that lawyer suing for ruining your good name? CND, that's just wrong (preaching to the choir, I know..  ) I hope this turns out well for you and you get an apology from someone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
As for the credit card comment, they've already started that. Two of mine have had their max available credit dropped, one had a balance with things auto-charged and they dropped the balance to the point where I would go over-balance the next month. If I hadn't done some quick maneuvering I'd be in the hole for over-balance fees. And yes, your debt-to-available-credit ratio is affected, which affects your credit report and score. Mine dropped 10 points .. it's still over 750 but that isn't the point.
I guess the only way to get around this is to max out all the credit cards. Write those checks they send with the promotional or long-term low % charges to yourself and either deposit in an interest-bearing account or whatever. Then they can't lower your credit limit, and when the credit problems are over in a few years, just pay them back down with the same money. Might lose a bit due to the fact you never earn more interest than what they'll be charging (hmm unless you do a CD) but I'd rather have my credit score only dip for a while with the better chance of it going back up later when they're paid off, plus still having the "credit" (just a withdrawal away) available "just in case".
I've been thinking about paying off the first cards (the ones who have lowered my limit already - that really irked me) with checks from the ones I want to keep. Lower interest, and they can close those accounts for all I care. I'd rather not do business with them anyway if that's the way they're going to treat their customers.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
Texas Trader is dead on and I guess I will join him in front of the firing squad. First, banks are a business, functioning as a conduit for monetary exchange in both the consumer and commerce segments of the industry, with the sole purpose of making a profit . Yes they are highly regulated by the govt. However, this regulation is primarily aimed at safeguarding depositors investments by scrutinizing how the business is ran and punishes them for losing money. When you calculate the cost of administrating a checking account, issuing statements, stamps, envelopes, charges by the coin handling co.,labor and the likes, a typical roller searcher is seen as a large expense. The bank is not obligated to do business with all people and has discretion over whom they do business with. If the govt were to force them to accept business that costs them money with the idea being that banks are obligated to serve all business that involves currency, the govt would be obligated to offset some if not all of this lose. We are not part of the financial economy, we do not effect the flow of money or commerce, we are a hobby and banks are not our playground. If we want to continue with our love going forward, we will have to figure out how to fit into the system. We are either going to have to have enough business with the bank that what we generate offsets the cost of our hobby or we are going to have to pay the costs that we generate. The idea that a bank has to accept our business because they handle the govt's currency is tantamount to the notion that grocery stores must sell you food at a lose so you can afford it "because they feed the world". We are all being forced to tighten the budget, just as banks are. We want interest on our checking, higher interest on savings, longer lobby hour but at the same time want them to not have the ability to control costs. My grandfather would say, "that's wanting egg in your beer". That would be a Miller Lite for me.  Jim
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1082 Posts |
How do they know you're not just rolling your change from home and depositing it?
Wasn't that how Bank Christmas Clubs were started?
I'd have a chat with a local newspaper reporter, and maybe a TV reporter as well.
And yes, file a complaint with your local BBB as well.
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
YEah, imagine the bank's headache after a quarrel with the Better Business Bureau.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
Especially since banks are the pariahs of the business world at the moment.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
A nice write up in the Editor's section of the local Newspaper (and maybe some of the bigger Newspapers nearby), might get the attention of a lot of folks that do their banking at SunTrust. The article may even land on the CEO's desk and some of the Stockholders may take interest it it as well. I also believe that a local Television Station would love to do a story on it as well!
Frank
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
$500 in halves or $100 in cents every week or two probably is not going to be thought of as rolling pocket change.
The Better Business bureau probably won't even get involved. If they do they will ask the bank why and the response will be:
Mr. X keeps a minimum balance of $xxx. The banks cost of maintaining a account is $XXX. He brings in large sums of coins every week which the cost of handling is $XXX. The bank is losing $XXX a month and we can't afford to keep these types of accounts without passing the expense on to other customers in the form of higher fees. They do not deserve it. And the BBB says, thank you, we understand.
Guys, we do not have an inalienable right to expect the bank to fund our habit and I love searching Lincoln rolls so I understand where you are coming from.
Jim
Edited by Jim1953 06/16/2009 1:08 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2335 Posts |
Here's a question & answer from the United States Treasury web site. It doesn't address exchanging one type of coin/currency for another, but it does talk about a private business having the option to accept different forms of money. Quote: I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal? The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: " United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
The bank could have offered an alternative - they always have those accounts with minimum balances, and if you don't have that minimum, they charge you a service fee. At what balance would they be making XXX amount and it be 'worth it' to have a particular account? I heard mention someone offered to pay a fee and the bank saying they had no way to charge one - sure they do: Change the account type to one that charges a fee. Or a bigger fee, whatever. They aren't using their imagination (oops, we ARE talking about banks here) nor are they thinking about the consequences. They probably just lost (at least) one customer for good because they didn't bother to try to work something else out first. The easy route was to just dump the account. Act in haste, repent at leisure.. (And Jim, thanks.. now I know where that saying "here's egg in your beer" comes from! Always sounded a little gross to me  )
|
|
Valued Member
United States
224 Posts |
You know that if everyone could afford to hoard coins, then in 6 months to a year, the Banks would change their tune in respect to cashing in coinage! Once the local and nearby supplies of change dries up, then companies like Wells Fargo would have to pay more to get coins shipped in from elsewhere and pass those extra costs on to the Banks. If the Banks can't meet their demand for coins, then the Businesses will suffer and so will the Banks. The Banks may then have to offer a premium for any bulk coins brought in and cashed in at the Bank. I have seen this happen in 1973 or 1974 with the American Express in Germany! They actually had to offer 2x face for every Lincoln Cent brought in because their' supply was totally depleted and another shipment of coins from the U.S. wasn't expected for at least a month or more. Frank
Edited by huntsman53 06/16/2009 1:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6326 Posts |
Quote:They actually had to offer 2x face for every Lincoln Cent brought in because their' supply was totally depleted and another shipment of coins from the U.S. wasn't expected for at least a month or more. Finally !....."NOW" we know why the Mint overproduces Billions and Billions of coins every year....  Actually.....I bet we do often forget that our currency is "worldwide" .......not just for "here". And some countries "only" use U.S. currency !! So, it's not "how many coins per American citizen".......Not at all !......it's a "worldwide" distribution !!.....GOOD GRIEF ! .... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
xshift, you are dead on. This is a knee jerk reaction by the bank. However, it is not nearly as important to them as it is us. How many roll searchers do you think each branch has. They are not going to put much thought into one or two accounts. We are going to have to get proactive if we want to solve this. If we address it up front as the author of this thread attempted to do, maybe we can find away to make this a win win situation. You know, as I think about it. Vending companies have to have counters. Maybe we can find a way to strike a working arrangement with one of them to process our coins.  Jim
Edited by Jim1953 06/16/2009 2:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1151 Posts |
Quote: Actually.....I bet we do often forget that our currency is "worldwide" .......not just for "here". And some countries "only" use U.S. currency ! I was watching a program on I think the History channel about the banking industry and they said there is more US currency held over seas than in the US itself. Quote: Vending companies have to have counters. Maybe we can find a way to strike a working arrangement with one of them to process our coins. That was going to be my suggestion also.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: Interesting,now I must wonder if a bank, any bank, would have the right to turn away a customer for changing rolls of coins for paper money. It's all legal tender and after all, that's what banks are there for. Of course they have the right to turn away a customer for almost any reason they chose. And whatever gave you the idea that banks are there for the purpose of changing money? They are there for one reason to make money. And they make their money by loaning out money and charging interest on that money. To a lesser extent they make it through fees. If they have an account owner whose actions are costing them money rather making money for them it is not too surprising that they would want that account closed. Quote: I was informed by the other bank that I was on the national "blacklist" of either TeleCheck or ChexSystems, and they could not open an account for me! I checked with ChexSystems, and they told me that this large bank had closed my account due to BANK FRAUD! Now Coppernickeldaddy on the other hand has grounds for a suit against the bank. His unjustly being accused of bank fraud and having that accusation spread around via the blacklist has caused him damage and that should be actionable.
|
| |
Replies: 65 / Views: 5,299 |