Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Denver Mint Marks On 1964-D Nickels.

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 332Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6455 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  11:25 am Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
A couple years ago when I was much newer at CRH, I read a Variety Vista entry on 1963 Denver mint marks on 1964 nickels. As a result, I stashed about 100 1964-D coins in a Ziploc bag, which I have now encountered again during cleanup. I figured what the heck, so I looked at them all again. I did spot a few that could theoretically be 1963 slanted D mint marks, but then I ran across this oddity.

Denver-Mint-Marks-On-1964-D-Nickels.

The D seems much shorter and smaller than a typical 1964-D. I put them side by side so it's easier to see. The host coin does have evidence of radial flow, but Die Deterioration is really common on 1964 nickels. That was the first year the nickel mintages hit a billion coins, possibly in preparation for switching dimes and quarters to clad coins the next year. The serifs and spine also seem different to the normal curved spine and pointed serifs.

I realized that I didn't know if the same mint marks were used for all denominations in prior years. I do know that post 1960s coins all use the same punch, but I believe WWII and earlier denominations had different punches at different times, and also sometimes different sized punches for dimes and foreign coins made at the mints.

Anybody have insights into this odd little D?
Valued Member
United States
109 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  12:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Rocky B to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hmm... It does look mighty peculiar...
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94765 Posts
Pillar of the Community
Willburton's Avatar
United States
2558 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  5:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Willburton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking possibly vlds
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6455 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  6:28 pm  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Dearborn, that was the reference I used. The mint mark guides for each denomination have some additional notes. I made some comparisons among PCGS graded coins of various years, but that's only easy to do for the same denomination where you can line up features for scale.

I will post a few comparisons later.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Brandmeister's Avatar
United States
6455 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  6:35 pm  Show Profile   Check Brandmeister's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Brandmeister to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I'm thinking possibly vlds

It is definitely late die state, but I can't recall VLDS shrinking a mint mark vertically.

I am wondering if the mint mark wasn't punched shallow, or the die polished after a clash in a way that wore away the thicker parts of the mint mark.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8728 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  6:53 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The example that looks smaller, does it look like the dies were heavily polished/abraded? I have seen that totally change the size and look of different devices.
-makecents-
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
-makecents-'s Avatar
United States
8728 Posts
 Posted 03/05/2026  7:00 pm  Show Profile   Check -makecents-'s eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add -makecents- to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
And as far as style and size of the punch for different denomination, they are the same. Coop clued me in on that a few years ago, I assumed the larger denominations had a larger punch but no, the same....
-makecents-
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94765 Posts
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 332Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums