Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Shop CCF Members on eBay! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Commems Collection Modern: What If? 1973 Apollo 11 / Lunar Landing Trust Fund

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 157Next Topic  
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12250 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2026  1:10 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Following up on my previous post on the initial effort to authorize a base metal Apollo 11 commemorative coin and establish the Apollo Lunar Landing Commemorative Trust Fund, to add a look at the second phase of the effort. You can view Phase I here: What If? 1971 Apollo 11 / Lunar Landing Trust Fund.)

Apollo 11 Mission Patch Emblem
Commems-Collection-Modern:-What-If?-1973-Apollo-11-/-Lunar-Landing-Trust-Fund
(Image Source: Smithsonian Institution, National Air and Space Museum. Fair Use.)

Representative Olin Earl Teague (D-TX) tried again to secure "coinage of 50-cent pieces to commemorate the Apollo 11 lunar landing and to establish the Apollo Lunar Landing Commemorative Trust Fund." He did so in February 1973 - almost two years after his initial attempt.

The new bill mirrored his original bill of March 1971 - up to 50 million 50-cent pieces of standard composition (i.e., Copper-Nickel ("CuNi") Clad) and creation of an Apollo 11 Trust Fund that would be the beneficiary of potential net proceeds from sales of the coins.

As in his original bill, the Apollo Lunar Landing Commemorative Commission was to oversee the coin's designs and be the party responsible for placing orders for the coin. The coins were to be "disposed of at par or at a premium by banks or trust companies and other commercial and governmental agencies selected by the Commission, and the net proceeds (if any) therefrom shall be paid to tbe Commission for deposit into the Apollo Lunar Landing Commemorative Trust Fund."

Also as in the original bill, the half dollar were to "contain a fractional content of an appropriate metal derived from the Apollo 11 spacecraft." A relic coin! (vs. a relic medal or token)

As with its predecessor, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Banking and Currency, but did not proceed further.

IMO, it's too bad this coin proposal did not succeed. It sounds like it would have produced a fairly low-cost collectible with true historic roots - and one that would have included actual Apollo 11 material. Very cool!


For other of my posts about commemorative coins and medals, including more "What If?" stories, see: Commems Collection




Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187446 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2026  2:00 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
IMO, it's too bad this coin proposal did not succeed. It sounds like it would have produced a fairly low-cost collectible with true historic roots - and one that would have included actual Apollo 11 material. Very cool!
I agree.

Thank you for sharing.
Moderator
Learn More...
nickelsearcher's Avatar
United States
15381 Posts
 Posted 04/21/2026  3:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nickelsearcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This would have been an interesting issue with an actual teeny amount of the Apollo spacecraft included.

Thanks for sharing
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
Moderator
Learn More...
Dearborn's Avatar
United States
94636 Posts
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16805 Posts
 Posted 04/22/2026  12:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So this is after the Eisenhower dollar was already established as a de-facto perpetual Apollo 11 commemorative? Seems like a bit of overkill, so I'm not surprised it did not make it out of committee.

The inclusion of material from Apollo 11 itself sounds cool and all, but one does wonder how that would have actually been physically accomplished in practice, given the possible composition options for a half-dollar. The metallic components of the Apollo spacecraft were made from aluminium, titanium, and steel - not substances that readily alloy compatibly with coinage metals. Further, very little of the actual Apollo 11 spaceship came back to Earth (and essentially none of the Lunar Lander that actually touched the Moon), and most of what did return was still intact as a museum relic (which probably wouldn't have been chopped up just to make coins); many of the "spare parts" for Apollo 11 that could in theory have been used to incorporate into coins would have been kept and used in subsequent Apollo missions, though by 1973 it would have been clear to Congress that the last Apollo had flown, those planned future missions had been cancelled and the Apollo Program itself terminated and wasn't coming back.

Finally, at a 50 million coin mintage, that would have required 567 tons of metal, and the entire Apollo 11 rocket even at launch didn't weigh that much (not counting the propellant). So these Apollo 11 coins would have had to have had a very, very diluted piece of spaceship in them.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
CCF Master Historian of USA Commemoratives
Learn More...
commems's Avatar
United States
12250 Posts
 Posted 04/22/2026  07:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add commems to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There was no legal specification for the amount of "relic" metal required for a coin/medal/token to bill itself as being a relic piece. A single bolt or piece of wire from the Apollo 11 spacecraft mixed into the copper-nickel melting pot for the alloy used to prepare coin planchets (outer clad layers) would have been enough - the "relic" portion of the coins was to be "fractional" per legislation and thus, likely, minuscule relative to the overall coin weight.



Collecting history one coin or medal at a time! (c) commems. All rights reserved.
Moderator
Learn More...
jbuck's Avatar
United States
187446 Posts
 Posted 04/22/2026  11:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jbuck to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wait. This sounds like it is bordering homeopathy. Does curpo-nickel have the same woo-woo "memory" properties as water?

Just to be clear, homeopathy is humbug.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 157Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums