| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,193 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1523 Posts |
Do you have that coin in hand?
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I don't Halfwitty. It's at home and I'm at work.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1490 Posts |
Wow the thread is crazy. Awesome Morgan. Probably MS65 at least.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1523 Posts |
Just curious as to whether the small squigly lines are raised or depressed.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Depressed. 
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
588 Posts |
wasn't it just scratched?
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I don't think so. I'm 99% sure it's struck thru lint,thread,or string. Coin in hand, you can clearly see what looks like a "clump" of the above embedded impression during the strike. I thought about TPG'n it.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
Nice find, I agree it is a strike through. I would send it in.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
That's neat. I would think something like that would be pretty uncommon. When they mint coins how do they keep lint, string, ect. off the coins. Compressed Air?
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
There is MUCH more quality control now days then there was in the 60's, 70's, 80's etc. I would imagine in 1881, the mints had some form of quality control to some extent. Sometimes, the "struck thru" errors can be unavoidable.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1304 Posts |
You're right vermontensium, I have to remind myself, this is 1881 we are talking about. 
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 2,193 |
|