Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Coin Value Of Kennedy Halves

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,039Next Topic  
Valued Member
Berry's Avatar
United States
394 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  7:02 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Berry to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Compare the value of a 1970-D Kennedy half with a total mintage of 2,150,000 to the value of a 1987-D Kennedy with a total mintage of 2,890,000. Both coins were only available in mint sets, yet the 1970-D is worth (generally) twice as much. I know that there is an age difference of 17 years, but the 1987-D has never received the attention of the 1970-D. Anybody got any ideas?
Berry
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  7:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Berry

Check the metal compositions of the 2 coins, the 70-D is 40% silver while the 87-D is Copper nickle.

1970 was the last year that silver was used in circulation coins.

Rick
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  7:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know if it would have much to do with it but the 1970-D is silver clad and the 1987's are nickel clad copper. Then you look at the 1964's where where 90% silver and they are valued less than the 70 and the same as the 87's. These are currect Red Book prices. Not sure why this would be either. Maybe a Kennedy expert will come along. I don't know much about them myself.
Pillar of the Community
Metalman's Avatar
United States
7123 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  7:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Metalman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Irish

With the 64's you are then into mintages,,the 70-D is a semi key for the Kennedies,,

1964-P 273,304,004

1964-D 156,205,446

with the 70-D having a mintage of 2,150,000

Rick
Pillar of the Community
cladking's Avatar
United States
2270 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  8:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cladking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are numerous reasons and metallic composition would play a role. Perhaps the largest single reason is the relationship between supply and demand. There are around 750,000 casual collectors of Kennedys and another 50,000 more serious ones. This puts a stress of sorts on the availability of the '70-D but a much lower stress on the '87 issues. It is quite easy still to find quantities of the '87 mint sets but the days of finding lots of '70 sets are long gone. Many of the '70 sets that survive have very poor quality half dollars because the better ones are in collections and time has not been kind to the surfaces of these coins. The '87 issues are mostly still pristine and there has not been extensive cherry picking yet. Your mintage figure is a little low as well. These also appeared in the souvenir mint sets and these mintages got lost in a limbo somewhere. In those days mint set totals were included in regular production run totals and reported separately. Souvenir set totals were also included but not reported. It's not known how many of these were made but 100,000 of each should be in the ballpark.

Curiously, gem '70-D Kennedys are not especially difficult to come by. Around 3% of the mintage was of gem quality. The '87 issues are far tougher yet don't command much more. This is likely because new collectors can still find their own '87 gems because of the availability of sets but the '70 gems are very elusive because of attrition and cherry picking.

As time goes on this pricing structure should evolve to more closely approximate their relative availability.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Valued Member
Berry's Avatar
United States
394 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  8:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Berry to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great information on the Kennedy halves. I was aware of the silver content of the 70-D vs. the 87-D clad, but thought the availability would have more impact than it does. After the explantions, it makes more sense than before my post. Thanks metalman, irishraider and cladking.

Berry
Pillar of the Community
Irishraider's Avatar
United States
1454 Posts
 Posted 08/05/2006  9:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Irishraider to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yep, I always learn something off of these kinds of posts. I want to start a Kennedy set but am waiting to get my Franklin set done first.

I didn't even think of the mintage figures, glad Rick brought that up.

  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,039Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums