Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1902 O Morgan VAM?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 71 / Views: 6,152Next Topic
Page: of 5
Pillar of the Community
aladinslamp's Avatar
United States
3076 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  1:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add aladinslamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
note the 2 is not filled on the VW plate3 photo's, but Alans book posts them, VW does post your date and Cracks..

1902-O-Morgan-VAM?
Valued Member
remmy1100's Avatar
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  1:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add remmy1100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The filled numbers are no longer PUPs IMO
Edited by remmy1100
08/26/2010 1:49 pm
Pillar of the Community
aladinslamp's Avatar
United States
3076 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  2:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add aladinslamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
yes, the filled 2 were on many dies for 02, I don't believe they are direct PUP'S, but do help, one still has to use date and MM and reverse types to narrow them down..
Valued Member
remmy1100's Avatar
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  2:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add remmy1100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The problem with the filled 2's is that there are VAMs that have been noted to have a filled number only to have examples of the same VAM that do not have it. This should only "at best" be a secondary diagnostic. If you are trying to attribute 1902-O VAMs from the VAMworld site and it is not an obvious coin, its almost a waste of time. Most other series I would not agree with that, but the 02-O series has to be the most difficult to attribute. This is one series that without the guide, most will be lost. (again not counting the obvious coins)
Pillar of the Community
Ozland's Avatar
United States
709 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  2:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ozland to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There is only one 1902-O VAM known (at this time)that has pitting around D in dollar. That VAM is VAM 18.
Valued Member
remmy1100's Avatar
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  3:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add remmy1100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I wish I had my 02-O guide at work... LOL I agree that the only pitted D known in the 02-O is the VAM-18... That said, before I comment more, I need to check the guide. I am confused by the MM being tilted left and the date being within Normal. I will cross reference the guide (unless you already are Oz) and reply later.
Edited by remmy1100
08/26/2010 3:53 pm
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  7:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add zeewool to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
In my opinion, one aspect of this site which makes it stand out, head and shoulders above the others, is the willingness of you guys to jump in and help a newbie out like you have. I recall at some other locations, a cry for help from a new person might be met with aloofness, or a demeanor of unwillingness due to the belief that their knowledge had come at great cost, and worth more than just the appreciation of the inquirer.

It ain't over yet prlahr, one of these guys will come up with the correct answer, I can just feel it.

By the way, I recall asking Alan when he announced that he was deep into researching the '02-O, just why did he pick this particular date/mm to zero in on...("were all of the interesting dates already taken?") I expected such obvious jest to be returned in kind, but the response was serious and I thought that this was rather out of character for such a dry wit. Now a book ensues, I should have suspected this, but am surprised nonetheless.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
carmykle's Avatar
United States
2448 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  7:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add carmykle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hear Hear! All of us VAM neophytes and wannabes agree!
Pillar of the Community
Ozland's Avatar
United States
709 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  8:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ozland to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are a couple of things to note: Vamming is a continual work in progress. John Roberts ( a VAM attributor) put it nicely when he said, "think of it as moving pieces on a chessboard. I'd go even further and say it compares to assembling a jigsaw puzzle without the boxtop as a guide. We have only a fuzzy idea of what 'the big picture' really is until most of the pieces are in their proper place."
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add zeewool to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think that this is the sort of thread that Gene could really sink his teeth into. Too bad....(He must be pretending that his computer isn't working again).
Pillar of the Community
aladinslamp's Avatar
United States
3076 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add aladinslamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe there is no doubt this coin is VAM 32,
1) I do believe we can all agree that the date placement is normal..
also note these pictures are yours just blown up showing 2 specific things A the cracks at the neck to the date and specifically the gouge under the first left star of the date
1902-O-Morgan-VAM?
this is a excerpt from the book of the first left star gouges found on some coins.

1902-O-Morgan-VAM?
2) also not that your earlier photo clearly shows it to be c4/c3 2nd olive reverse
1902-O-Morgan-VAM? VAM 18 and VAM 18A are c4 single olive reverse coins..here is your photo of the mint mark.. set right lilted left

1902-O-Morgan-VAM? Note the D...is not pitted the pitting is NOT raised as VAM 18A is...here is the plate of VAM 18A

1902-O-Morgan-VAM?
VAM world plates to not show all of these things but the book does...
Vam32
Pillar of the Community
Ozland's Avatar
United States
709 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  9:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ozland to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Please take pictures of the first left star on the obverse. If VAM 32 you should have gouges under the first left star.
Pillar of the Community
3660 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  9:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add zeewool to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You know Gene, I wasn't going to get into the pitting thing, but I never really did buy what looks to me as a depression ( PMD) on the coin, to be a pit in the coin. Only the OP could verify if it is raised or not, but I do see a difference in the pitting on your photo of 18A, and the lack of it on the OP's coin. Yeah, the area around the star is the same. You say that the crack is also identical? Are there more pup photos from the book that the OP could use to compare to his/her coin? We are not doing anything wrong by posting these pictures from the book are we?

At this point, all I see that is 32ish is the star. Does the 32 share this obverse with any other varieties? Can you nail down the reverse also?
Valued Member
remmy1100's Avatar
United States
380 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add remmy1100 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree. This IS NOT VAM-18. The date is in fact is in the wrong position. I am looking at the guide right now. The MM, and date do appear to be a VAM-32. Good call Gene! Although you will notice that the picture in the book does show the filled 2, but the caption only says date placement and die crack. Nothing about the filled 2. VAM-32 is within normal date position also.
Edited by remmy1100
08/26/2010 10:03 pm
Pillar of the Community
aladinslamp's Avatar
United States
3076 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2010  10:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add aladinslamp to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yess there are a few more pointers for VAM 32,, the doubled ear I believe is shown in his picture, just not well enough do to the angle of the picture trying to shoot thru a loupe..
there is a specific die file line on the upper most arrow head, about the middle of the arrow head..The filled 2, is known on many that year for being later die states, the one posted on VAM World is an EDS..
also there are very minor rim Cuds that from his pictures can not be seen...though he should be able to see them with his loupe.. also doubled eagles nostril and eye...
  Previous TopicReplies: 71 / Views: 6,152Next Topic
Page: of 5

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums