| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 2,144 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I have never seen a GSA Morgan in a NGC slab, I always saw them with the tape around it. If NGC has started doing this to the GSA coins I think this is a huge mistake on their part  |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I thought it was the submitters choice. Have the pedigree put on the slab or have the NGC band put on the GSA slab. I'm sure NGC still offers their "certified" banding if it's desired.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
14454 Posts |
I have sent in GSA Morgans plenty of times and I don't remember ever having a choice. There was actually a slot on the submission forms especially for GSA and come to think about it I don't remember seeing that on the new submission forms they sent me either. I hope they still leave ones submitted in the GSA Holders because as I said above if they have started putting them in their own slabs I feel this is a HUGE mistake on their part
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I just looked and its still on the submission forms but see no place to choose if you want it left in the GSA holder or put into a NGC slab
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
It might have been a earlier submission that was reholdered or something, did ngc always grade the gsas in their softpacks? I thought early on they did not.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I don't know about soft packs, I do know this is one of NGC's newest holders. Either way I just say I hope they didn't change their policy about GSA's
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Until a three or four years ago they did NOT grade the softpacks and leave them in the government packaging. They always cut them out. I'm sure they still grade the hardpacks and leave them in the government holders unless requested otherwise.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1801 Posts |
Could be a crossover coin from a PCGS slab or a resubmission for some reason of an older slab. Remember that many of the GSA oins were cracked out and sent to TPGs before NGC came up with it's wrap around certification.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
to be honest when I saw this I never thought about soft packs, I just knew I had never seen any GSA Morgans in NGC slabs that I can remember and it kind of freaked me out. I was hoping they hadn't changed policy on GSA's but thought maybe someone on here knew for sure. This is one area they excel above all other TPG's and was hoping they hadn't stabbed themselves in the foot on this one |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2448 Posts |
That's what I was thinking too; crossover. That is Bryan, unless you sent submitted it in a GSA Slab.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2223 Posts |
Crossover would explain it. I also prefer them in the GSA holders with the NGC certification wrap. Nice looking CC
|
|
Valued Member
United States
167 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
455 Posts |
I agree. The GSAs should remain in the original holders. That's how they keep their integrity and makes them more desirable in their original packaging!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
56 Posts |
Submitters choice and to an extent to compete with PCGS who will only do it pedigree style.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 2,144 |
|
Posted 11/09/2010 01:38 am
