| Author |
Replies: 425 / Views: 38,450 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
423 Posts |
Commoncents13: Well you mention plastic which I assume you mean to make a fait even more worthless. I countered with silver. I stated reasons why the RCM had to be careful about how much silver they put into a coin because of people's greed, to keep them in circulation, silver volatility etc... Think of this: I like blue. This is about a red coin. I come into the forum and say "Red coins suck, you are all suckers. Bye I am leaving." It is valid for me to say that is meaningless, because it is. I think you didn't think and were ranting and I pointed it out and you took it as personal. It is not. Next topic. I think it is great the RCM is getting some silver out there. It may only be backed by 39% but it is a start and I can see lots of reasons the RCM has to be careful with that number as there is a lot of variables out of their control and if the get it wrong everyone will bust them for it. I wouldn't want Canada to be a credit card society. It would be best if the Canadian dollar was back partly by something. A private company controlling the money is going to lead to problems. Someone tell me a fiat that has lasted for 200 years? All fiats have failed. Anyways, it is an interesting coin. I hope they make 2 million next year. I don't care about it's collector valve. I don't care if I can make an easy buck on it. I think it is better for the Canadian economy in the long run and would make the mint look very smart if that is there plan. I hope it is not a one year thing.
Edited by realpenny 02/08/2011 6:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
598 Posts |
I typically have no interest in the RCMs NCLT either, but it's stuff like this... all 14 pages of these pros, cons, he/she/you/whoever saids, RCM profitteering, real value etc., etc... controversy, mann, controversy.  That's the interest for me. Like Norfed silver, and any other bizarre... ...and hey, canadian_coins, you said VVV ... Quote: ... Here too, some people still think today that the trading token should 'hold its weight in gold'. Of course this is wishful thinking because there isn't enough gold on earth to hold all the circulating debts...
... well, if not enough gold, then that gold price needs to come up a little, eh. 
|
|
Valued Member
423 Posts |
IBGolden: The problem is a lot of people don't even understand fiat let alone golds real worth. If most people continue to assume 'credit cards = a store of wealth' gold's real valve will never be attained. C_C basically said debt (in credit - which is usually owned by a private company) is the majority view - it is a fact. If the majority accepts some made up private credits then gold has little worth, unless the system fails. Then the private credits are worthless, gold on the other hand would be well... worth it's weight. This coin though is interesting because of it's place in the market (I think C_C has said this). It is not a collector coin. It is not a silver standard. It is not totally fiat. It seems to be a well thought out blend - but maybe I give the RCM too much credit? I think the coin is a better direction then the one we are headed in. Just on the news right now they were taking about record level Canadian debts again. It would be great if the RCM slowly and safely backs some legal tender with something physical - it can never be a 100% backed because there is too many ways to game the system. Next year I hope for 2 million and they get spent. If you want convenience then carry plastic or paper. If you want a little backing then trade convenience for coins. Choice is good. A backed financial system is even better. Look at the American credit system and how it failed.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
276 Posts |
@Realpenny: Until society decides that gold isn't worth it's weight in gold either. Because your argument against credit works against gold as well. Gold has no value other than that given it by society. Not even in electronics, where there are cheaper, better metal alloys. Silver will always be more "useful" because of it's antibacterial properties - but again, cheaper synthetic versions out there.
A backed financial system isn't realistic, because we're so far out of touch with the 'real value' (as you say) of money that backing it would create such a dis-equilibrium that it would cause more problems than it solves.
|
|
Valued Member
423 Posts |
Rodime: I have already said society (general population) does not see gold that way currently. There are pros and cons to both credit and gold. Gold though has stood a test of time. Credit has clearly caused a lot of problems. You can easily make money playing both sides if you see it for what it is. Manufacturing uses aside - precious metals have been a store of wealth for recorded history. I doubt that will change anytime soon.
I have also stated why a 100% back financial system won't happen. There is too many ways to game that system. But a 50% backed system is harder to game and could make our money more attractive to hold. If you are China and want to hold a few billion dollars would you prefer a US promise with papers or a Canadian promise with 39% backing on silver. Both countries could lie to China or make huge financial mistakes and crash their store of wealth. At least with the hypothetical Canadian coins 39% would be recoverable. Which is more attractive? There is many scenarios that can be played out and worked though.
I think why people don't like this coin is because they can't make an easy buck off it long term. The mint is smart - they see the angles. The mint, if they continue this series, would help strengthen our currency by at least partially backing it against something and at the same time protect our currency from poaching and profiteering. It also shows the mint isn't all one sided and that they are willing to put something of valve into the equation other than steel or plastic or paper. Holding a bit of cash is smart in a portfolio - that cash backed on a percentage of silver doesn't hurt.
I would like to see people spend the stuff and more of it. I think what will really happen is that "Visa" (Paypal, banks) will eventually control the money more and more and not the government. I think this is bad overall.
Edited by realpenny 02/08/2011 10:47 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
Well, I just can't wait to get my hands - humhum I mean, my gloves on this coin. It will take a while because they are shipped somewhere in Canada (can't ship to the US). 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
62 Posts |
Quote:...the RCM produces a fiat backed by a small amount of silver... It's an interesting discussion, but currency hasn't been physically 'backed' by anything since the demise of the gold standard; there's little about this coin that's any different than a twenty dollar bill - neither have any real intrinsic value in themselves.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts |
This coin DOES have intrinsic value - as a bit of bullion. The silver bullion has possible utility in a number of ways (medical, jewellery, etc), whereas a $20 bill is a little scrap of paper.
Even if there were 20 million of these coins made, they would probably never circulate. Like all the other popular modern commems, people pull them from circulation and save them as curios. Like, how many poppy quarters have you seen lately? But then, if the $20 bill is withdrawn & replaced with a silver coin, that'd be cool.
|
|
Valued Member
423 Posts |
defone: Through all of recorded history money has been backed by something. Until very recently it is been backed by nothing. I wouldn't use a short time period to judge something and imply everything with it is alright. I am sure (as are lots of other people) that government retirement plans in the USA and Canada (a new invention) will not stand the test of time.
1/4oz of silver vs a scrap of paper. It is obvious one has intrinsic valve and one does not. I put paper in the recycling bin all the time... I have never done that with silver.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1581 Posts |
> But then, if the $20 bill is withdrawn & replaced with a silver coin, that'd be cool. Still have the $5 and $10 to get through, first. But, a silver $5 coin would be interesting. But, considering the RCM are planning on debasing the $1 and $2 coin to steel (despite being very profitable as is) it shows the goal for true circulation coinage is not to back it with anything, either.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2408 Posts |
Quote: A backed financial system isn't realistic, because we're so far out of touch with the 'real value' (as you say) of money that backing it would create such a dis-equilibrium that it would cause more problems than it solves. Problems like these? 
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
276 Posts |
Quote: 1/4oz of silver vs a scrap of paper. It is obvious one has intrinsic valve and one does not. I put paper in the recycling bin all the time... I have never done that with silver.
Every thrown out any electronics? Likely you tossed out a bunch of precious metal. Thrown out a computer between 1990 and 2002? Threw out gold. Just saying.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
442 Posts |
Wow I'm surprised how much controversy this coin has received from here, as well as all the other silver forums out there. I wonder if the mint knew it would be such a hot topic when they released this coin! I gave out most of my stack to family for the Chinese new year, and they appreciate it. Something different than paper money. Anyone else receive theirs yet? They still selling on ebay?
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
322 Posts |
I emailed my Master Club rep about this coin and this is what he emailed me back.... Quote: The coin commemorates the strength of Canada. The maple leaves on the coin form a letter "C" on the coin in an upward flowing pattern into the distance representing Canada's ability to grow and progress.
This coin has a mintage of 200,000.00. It is a commemorative coin only and is not intended to replace the Canadian 20.00 dollar bill long term.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1581 Posts |
> They still selling on ebay? Many are being offered. But, ones with higher starting bids (e.g. $39.75) are not being bid on. With shipping, the range over the last 3-4 days has been about $30-$46.
|
| |
Replies: 425 / Views: 38,450 |