| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 6,541 |
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I just love those off metal strikes.
I have a few crazies like this from various countries around the World, but chiefly from Great Britain.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Yeah, they are pretty wacky all right :-)
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1418 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19947 Posts |
VERY cool! Congrats!
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
I hope you got a big discount for it being a memorial reverse....  Great coin, Jim
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Does it have the reeded edges or plain?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It would have to be plain. Cents don't have a reeded edge and it probably didn't touch the collar too much anyway. Reeding happens during the striking of the coin in the collar.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Exactly as coop stated, plain edge.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Perhaps a matter of semantics, but there is a difference that comes out in value.
An "off metal" coin is a coin struck on a planchet cut to the size for the coin - just of the wrong composition.
This error is different - it is a cent struck on a dime planchet - not an 'off metal strike'.
There is also such thing as 'wrong stock strike' coins where, say, clad made for a dime is run through the blanking press for quarters producing quarters as thin as dimes.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
I think the 1970-D Quarter struck on dime stock would be a good example and quite common for this type of error.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Besides being thinner, they are also weaker struck: 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
great error! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1204 Posts |
I want one of these so bad ! I ll keep looking .
|
|
Moderator
  United States
16679 Posts |
Thanks everyone. I am pretty sure the later dates get more rare. I think the latest one I saw was in an NGC holder and it was a 2003 or 2006. As we all know, technology improves, so are the chances of finding less errors :-(
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
380 Posts |
Very cool... What kind of thing happens in the mint for the wrong planchet or wrong stock? Just plain old human error?
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 6,541 |