Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Couple Of New 8 Reales Additions (Neat Error)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 6,225Next Topic
Page: of 3
Pillar of the Community
United States
686 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2011  01:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Westwood Arms to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The weakness on the pillar side at the crown also caught my attention, even before I read through the thread.

Richard, Kent, Corey, NGC, PCGS, are the only ones I trust on these.
Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2011  01:26 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The 21 Zs with "no mouth" is aways a suspect coin. Do you have the abilty to do a specific gravity test on it or at least weigh it?


I'm getting ready to move into a new house, so my SG scale is already packed. The weight of the Zacatecas piece is 26.91g with edge overlaps at 1 and 7 o'clock.

Edited to add pictures of the edge overlaps:

A-Couple-Of-New-8-Reales-Additions-Neat-Error
Edited by TwoKopeiki
07/23/2011 01:47 am
Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2011  01:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Richard, Kent, Corey, NGC, PCGS, are the only ones I trust on these.


Where's fun in that?
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 07/23/2011  5:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with jfransch the 1821 no mouth is always a suspect and this coin has some of the traits of a Boston style forgery.

The bullion fakes (Boston types) are noted for die cutting errors - wrong dates (like 1294 or 1872 or 1896 all Charles IIII), wrong associations die to die (mules of incorrect designs), spelling errors and position elements like the misplaced s. But they will be full weight correct assay silver - that is why they escape detection and were used for so long in China. Many "returning" Boston's come from China so we can attach blame to the wrong party (in a few cases).

SG would detect a fraud - a low silver alloy but that would move this coin to the normal Counterfeit category.

I would like to know the SG here.

Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 09/11/2011  2:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1810 Mexico and 1821 Zacatecas are back from NGC.

They took about 5 weeks researching the Zacatecas piece and at the end of it all gave it an AU55 grade, properly attributed as "S after 8".

1810 didn't make the MS grade and coming back to me in an AU58 holder.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 09/12/2011  12:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am glad the coin certified. That is good for you and your investment.

Unfortunately it is not a guarantee that the coin was not made in the 1880's. The "Boston" style coins were in some instances made so well that they DO pass as real. That is what makes them soooooo interesting as a group.

The proof I offer is of course the Micro O US dollars that certified for years until a group was submitted simultaneously and a grader noted an impossible die match. That was just DUMB LUCK that resulted in those forgeries being spotted.

Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 09/12/2011  12:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Bob,

I agree that certification by NGC is not a sure indication of this coin not being a Boston style counterfeit. My only point of reference for this error is Calbeto's "Compendium", but as you know it was published way after the Boston era. To this day I still don't know exactly what NGC does during their unknown coin research period that lasts multiple weeks, but I would assume some kind of metal composition testing is involved (perhaps I'm giving them too much credit).

Personally, I am just happy that a Calbeto variety was attributed, since I use that reference extensively and try to build on it with additional die varieties I encounter.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 09/12/2011  12:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
On page 727 of the Second volume of Calbetto's work is a very interesting note;

Quote:

The author's mind is open to corrections and data tending to prove that some pieces in the "Catalog" are fakes, or coins shown as "counterfeits" are genuine.

No line is thinner than the one that separates the fantasy from the facts, that sometimes are not totally known.

Fortunately very few pieces are in the border line.


Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 09/12/2011  1:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Good quote and well said, Bob. I think as a collector of these coins you kind of have to have an open mind :)
Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2012  2:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Had a chance to perform SG before sending it back for a reholder and it tested 10.3
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 07/29/2012  6:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TwoKopeiki The SG is correct but that does not mean it is definitely real and that is the real problem. XRF testing takes it to the next level but unfortunately some of the Boston - Class 2 types will also test perfectly correctly based on when they were made and where the raw silver came from.

The only Class 2 coins that test wrong are the ones that show trace contaminant changes that occur about 1870 and the ones which used Bolivian silver instead of Mexican.

I understand that NGC is doing XRF but they are likely in the same boat as we are - only SOME achieve definitive levels of proof while most can still remain ambiguous.
Pillar of the Community
Czech Republic
803 Posts
 Posted 07/30/2012  08:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add TwoKopeiki to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Bob, what I'm failing to understand is why would someone bother counterfeit a coin using correct amount of silver in the process?
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 07/30/2012  11:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TK : from what I understood from his previous posts - foreigners had a high confidence in spanish silver.
Money which you can't trust don't have as much value. Hence those "fakes" from non-spanish countries.
Did I got it Swamperbob ?
Pillar of the Community
jfransch's Avatar
United States
1801 Posts
 Posted 07/30/2012  11:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jfransch to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
TK, it is because you could buy the silver needed to make the bustman dollar for less than $1 and the Bustman coins actually carried a premium (up to 8% according to the book "Crime of 73" by Robert Van Ryzin) over a US dollar because of their demand for trade in the Orient. Silver was flooding the markets as the Comstock and other major silver finds were ramping up production. The US Trade dollar made its appearance to try and compete but was unsuccessful and the Morgan dollars that followed starting in 1878 were really minted as a government subsidy to the Western Silver interests, there was no need in commerce for the hundreds of millions of Morgan dollars that were minted, they were just struck, bagged and stored away in the treasury buildings.
Pillar of the Community
MathieuMa's Avatar
France
1591 Posts
 Posted 07/30/2012  12:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MathieuMa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks jfransch, that's what I was trying to say, with all the required details ! :D
  Previous TopicReplies: 33 / Views: 6,225Next Topic
Page: of 3

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.4 seconds to rattle this change. Forums