| Author |
Replies: 33 / Views: 6,225 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
686 Posts |
The weakness on the pillar side at the crown also caught my attention, even before I read through the thread.
Richard, Kent, Corey, NGC, PCGS, are the only ones I trust on these.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Quote: The 21 Zs with "no mouth" is aways a suspect coin. Do you have the abilty to do a specific gravity test on it or at least weigh it? I'm getting ready to move into a new house, so my SG scale is already packed. The weight of the Zacatecas piece is 26.91g with edge overlaps at 1 and 7 o'clock. Edited to add pictures of the edge overlaps: 
Edited by TwoKopeiki 07/23/2011 01:47 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Quote: Richard, Kent, Corey, NGC, PCGS, are the only ones I trust on these. Where's fun in that?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I agree with jfransch the 1821 no mouth is always a suspect and this coin has some of the traits of a Boston style forgery.
The bullion fakes (Boston types) are noted for die cutting errors - wrong dates (like 1294 or 1872 or 1896 all Charles IIII), wrong associations die to die (mules of incorrect designs), spelling errors and position elements like the misplaced s. But they will be full weight correct assay silver - that is why they escape detection and were used for so long in China. Many "returning" Boston's come from China so we can attach blame to the wrong party (in a few cases).
SG would detect a fraud - a low silver alloy but that would move this coin to the normal Counterfeit category.
I would like to know the SG here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
The 1810 Mexico and 1821 Zacatecas are back from NGC.
They took about 5 weeks researching the Zacatecas piece and at the end of it all gave it an AU55 grade, properly attributed as "S after 8".
1810 didn't make the MS grade and coming back to me in an AU58 holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
I am glad the coin certified. That is good for you and your investment.
Unfortunately it is not a guarantee that the coin was not made in the 1880's. The "Boston" style coins were in some instances made so well that they DO pass as real. That is what makes them soooooo interesting as a group.
The proof I offer is of course the Micro O US dollars that certified for years until a group was submitted simultaneously and a grader noted an impossible die match. That was just DUMB LUCK that resulted in those forgeries being spotted.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Hi Bob,
I agree that certification by NGC is not a sure indication of this coin not being a Boston style counterfeit. My only point of reference for this error is Calbeto's "Compendium", but as you know it was published way after the Boston era. To this day I still don't know exactly what NGC does during their unknown coin research period that lasts multiple weeks, but I would assume some kind of metal composition testing is involved (perhaps I'm giving them too much credit).
Personally, I am just happy that a Calbeto variety was attributed, since I use that reference extensively and try to build on it with additional die varieties I encounter.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
On page 727 of the Second volume of Calbetto's work is a very interesting note; Quote:
The author's mind is open to corrections and data tending to prove that some pieces in the "Catalog" are fakes, or coins shown as "counterfeits" are genuine.
No line is thinner than the one that separates the fantasy from the facts, that sometimes are not totally known.
Fortunately very few pieces are in the border line.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Good quote and well said, Bob. I think as a collector of these coins you kind of have to have an open mind :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Had a chance to perform SG before sending it back for a reholder and it tested 10.3
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
TwoKopeiki The SG is correct but that does not mean it is definitely real and that is the real problem. XRF testing takes it to the next level but unfortunately some of the Boston - Class 2 types will also test perfectly correctly based on when they were made and where the raw silver came from.
The only Class 2 coins that test wrong are the ones that show trace contaminant changes that occur about 1870 and the ones which used Bolivian silver instead of Mexican.
I understand that NGC is doing XRF but they are likely in the same boat as we are - only SOME achieve definitive levels of proof while most can still remain ambiguous.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Czech Republic
803 Posts |
Bob, what I'm failing to understand is why would someone bother counterfeit a coin using correct amount of silver in the process?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
France
1591 Posts |
TK : from what I understood from his previous posts - foreigners had a high confidence in spanish silver. Money which you can't trust don't have as much value. Hence those "fakes" from non-spanish countries. Did I got it Swamperbob ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1801 Posts |
TK, it is because you could buy the silver needed to make the bustman dollar for less than $1 and the Bustman coins actually carried a premium (up to 8% according to the book "Crime of 73" by Robert Van Ryzin) over a US dollar because of their demand for trade in the Orient. Silver was flooding the markets as the Comstock and other major silver finds were ramping up production. The US Trade dollar made its appearance to try and compete but was unsuccessful and the Morgan dollars that followed starting in 1878 were really minted as a government subsidy to the Western Silver interests, there was no need in commerce for the hundreds of millions of Morgan dollars that were minted, they were just struck, bagged and stored away in the treasury buildings.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
France
1591 Posts |
Thanks jfransch, that's what I was trying to say, with all the required details ! :D
|
| |
Replies: 33 / Views: 6,225 |