|
This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. | Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,602 |
|
New Member
United States
13 Posts |
we know if we do raise the debt limit then PM will go up for obvious reasons ....the worth of the dollar will go down proof QE2 QE1 inflation happens If we don't have QE3 then we default on our loans and the buck is worth less anyway .The only way that PM wont go up is if they cut spending and don't default without QE3 ,and neither side of the house wont come to an agreement !
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
193 Posts |
This may sound odd, but there is too much money washing around in the world. Vast amounts of it have been created to balance the sovereign debt side of the ledger. This money is sitting idly in banks looking for a use, and hence the precious metal price surges caused by all this 'spare' money. It is not just precious metals, this speculation is affecting just about all commodities from oil to sugar.
Unless huge write-downs of defaulted debt are made, prices will continue to inflate.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1450 Posts |
I believe that the debt ceiling will NOT be raised and the Fed will be forced to print money to cover the debt by debasing the currency. I believe we are on the cusp of monumental historical events that will fundamentally change the monetary systems of the world. There will be a push for a single worldwide currency but the Greek experience has opened many eyes to the dangers of inflexibilty in your currency. In the end a single currency will be thwarted but it will be a long,rough, painful process getting there.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
310 Posts |
If they increase the debt limit, they buy time. PM's will go up and we'll print money. If they don't pass the debt limit, they can't really print money. Printing money is debt. It's called treasuries. They've been financing this whole mess, by offering debt in the form of treasuries, and buying them by printing money. Essentially loaning money to themselves.
If they don't pass the increase, they can't issue new treasuries. No point in printing more money as they can't do anything with it.
If the dollar actually collapses, I'm not really interested in gold and silver. I'm more interested and guns and bullets.
I actually hope they don't pass an increase. To this point, all these measures have been to buy time and "hope" the economy recovered to where GDP would increase to be able to out grow the debt and recession problems. This was to avoid a true bursting of a bubble and try and soften the blow. More of a slow collapse as opposed to a bursting. The problem is, we haven't been able to plug the holes in the bubble. It's not re inflating fast enough. It's gonna suck, but it has to happen. Since we consume most of the world's products, and they also hold a lot of our debt, the rest of the world is gonna come with us.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3670 Posts |
Edited by Silverhawk74 07/17/2011 01:58 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
384 Posts |
By the way OP, increasing debt ceiling and QE are not the same things. You are using them interchangably in your statements as if they are one and the same.
Increasing of the debt ceiling is done by the Congress, and it may or may not cause any inflation, or effect the price of the US dollar. Only thing that is certain is that we owe more money then before, it does not directly imply anything about the supply of dollars. So debt ceiling rising may cause PMs to rise, but then again it may not.
On the other hand, QE is a function of the Federal Reserve. And QE will result in there being more dollars out there then there are right now, so their value will go down, and the PMs will go up.
The deadline we are about to hit soon, is for the debt ceiling, it has nothing to do with QE.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4008 Posts |
Quote: If we don't have QE3 then we default on our loans and the buck is worth less anyway . I agree with the previous post on this. QE3 and the debt ceiling are not the same things. It is possible to have both, one or the other, or neither. Like most financial issues, though, they are related. Raising the debt limit, for example, DOES impact the dollar because it shows that the US is not well managed financially and has to keep borrowing to keep going. More money WILL be printed and spent when the debt ceiling is raised, further reducing the value of the US dollar. The dollar is a symbol of our country and its strength. If we demonstrate financial incompetence, which we are doing, then the dollar will fall. People holding dollars will look for other places to put that money so that they can get a better yield or so that they are protected from monetary inflation. Sometimes, they choose other currencies for this. Sometimes, they choose bonds. At other times, they choose PMs. In a lot of cases, it is not that the alternative is so attractive, it is that the dollar is just so ugly!  As to QEx... I would be very interested in knowing why Bernanke is so enamored with doing this. Neither of the previous 2 QEs seem to have worked. When something is not working, a reasonable person quits doing it. Other than massively increasing the US debt, what exactly are the QEs doing for us? Or, is it more a matter of what they are doing TO us? :-/ The idea of the initial QE program was to "add liquidity to the market". The thieves on Wall Street and in the banks had apparently absconded with it all and new funds were needed... or so they say. OK, we had QE1 and are now awash in cheap money... but the unemployment rate is now higher than it was before QE1 was initiated. Clearly, adding jobs was not the reason for QE1. OK, then it was to increase the access to credit. But the banks are awash in money now and are not loaning much of it to potential borrowers. Adding more money via another QE program will not help this issue because all QE does is increase liquidity and we are not lacking liquidity now. They say that to a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Could it be that Bernanke's hammer is QE and that therefore ALL US monetary and financial problems are nails? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10034 Posts |
On Bernanke - lets face it. Either he is incredibly stupid and cannot see what he has done has killed us or...
there are larger politics at hand and he stands to personally profit from the situation.
Personally, I do not think anyone in power can be so stupid as to actually believe what has been done over the last few years was actually going to help the US economy (or was EVER meant to be a solution). Anyone with an IQ larger than a brick's will know you cannot make/spend worthless paper to get rid of debt.
US history has proven over and over that when the people are allowed to have/spend/save their own money the way they want that the economy/job market profits. I personally believe the main problem we are experiencing are results of the old saying that absolute power corrupts absolutely - on many different levels - within the government/bureaucracy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1450 Posts |
QE2 was designed to drive investors out of bonds and into stocks.By debasing the dollar our exports rose and corporate profits with it. TPTB are convinced that if they can keep stocks climbing,they can convince the American people that the economy is improving and we can all start spending again just like old times. It was,is,and always will be a charade trying to hide the magnitude of the problems we face. QE3 will kick in and debase the currency further to pay off the debt more cheaply. That is the only way to avoid default shortly down the road,we cannot do it reasonably with just spending cuts just like Greece,Italy,Ireland et al can't. If the debt ceiling is not raised,there are even fewer options because I don't see how QE3 could be implemented if there is no "expansion room" afforded the Fed. So,things look good for PM's no matter which way the debt ceiling issue falls.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote: If they don't pass the increase, they can't issue new treasuries. No point in printing more money as they can't do anything with it. True, but they can print money and buy Fannie and Freddie's inventories, releasing that money to buy whatever.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4008 Posts |
Quote: Anyone with an IQ larger than a brick's will know you cannot make/spend worthless paper to get rid of debt. True... and it isn't as if various governments around the world haven't tried this. They have and they all failed miserably. All this can do is enlarge the problem and delay the day of reckoning for a time. This question has been asked AND answered. There is NO reason to repeat the test.  Quote: On Bernanke - lets face it. Either he is incredibly stupid and cannot see what he has done has killed us or... I think that we can safely assume that Bernanke knows exactly what he is doing. Stupid people do not get Ph.D. degrees from prestigious schools, don't get to teach at Ivy League universities, and don't get appointed to lead the Fed. OK, that disposed with, let's now move on to why Bernanke is doing this. My thought is that he is well aware that the only thing that can save the US from a complete crash is to get the economy growing and producing again... and growing smartly, too. A goal of 5-6% growth per year would not be unreasonable. His problem, though, is that we now have an administration that favors idiotic policies that do not favor growth in the US economy. Therefore, Bernanke must be using all of his considerable powers as Fed chief to delay the day of reckoning and allow a new administration to come in and get this economy moving again. He is buying time and he is using the printing presses to do it because that is all he has that can do it. I believe that whether or not this will work depends completely on what happens in 2012-2014. Quote: QE2 was designed to drive investors out of bonds and into stocks. If so, Hock, then that seems to have worked. In fact, the US government is having a very hard time selling bonds right now. PIMCO won't have anything to do with US Treasury bonds and they are one of the biggest bond investors in the world. Foreigners are backing away from US bonds because of the dollar and debt problems we now have. The Fed is buying most of the new bonds that are coming out so that the extent of the market failure of these securities is made less obvious. I understand that a lot of people confuse the US economy and US stock market and think that when the stock market is doing well, all is fine with the economy. Tain't necessarily so, as my Grand Pap would have said.  Quote: True, but they can print money and buy Fannie and Freddie's inventories, releasing that money to buy whatever. Right on, Fred... and that is exactly what I expect them to do. The balance sheets of Freddie and Fannie must look absolutely abysmal. Any change there is likely to be a significant improvement. Shuffling them onto the Fed's balance sheet will make them look better but the Fed will then need some plan for flushing that toxic financial waste somewhere. They can't hold it forever. Or can they? 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote: I think that we can safely assume that Bernanke knows exactly what he is doing. Stupid people do not get Ph.D. degrees from prestigious schools, don't get to teach at Ivy League universities, and don't get appointed to lead the Fed. Sure they do. Kolidge is the same professors teaching by each others' books, often trading skules. Students end up getting the same "knowledge" no matter where they go. Well and good if they're taught correctly, but if the profs are trading around the same wrong ideas, the entire generation is out there doing stupid stuff that "everyone knows". It isn't until someone bucks the system, like the student who created Fed-Up, only to be told it wouldn't work by his prof, that anything gets accomplished. Problem: benzene levels too high at a refinery where they escape into the air. $100 million later, they manage to reduce them about 1%. Solution: employee suggests putting a rubber seal where one pipe transfers into a tank. $4 later, levels drop 95%.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
Quote: They can't hold it forever. Or can they? They don't need to hold it "forever", just "indefinitely". A judo person told me you have to be able to kick above your head. No, I only have to be able to kick above your head.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4008 Posts |
Quote: Problem: benzene levels too high at a refinery where they escape into the air. $100 million later, they manage to reduce them about 1%. Solution: employee suggests putting a rubber seal where one pipe transfers into a tank. $4 later, levels drop 95%. Been there, done and seen that many times, Fred. As an industrial R&D chemist, I know quite a bit about the diminishing returns of environmental remediation. In many cases, it becomes prohibitively expensive VERY quickly. Wastewater treatment is a good example. If you can reduce the contaminants in your process water by 90%, the same X amount of money spent again will get it to 93-94%, then again goes to 95%, and then again to 95.5%. After that, you are into fractions of a percent gain for every X amount spent. Very quickly, the business will become non-viable. The pollution finally goes to zero along with the business dying and all of the jobs lost. Oddly enough, none of the regulators comprehend this simple example and continue regulating pollution WAY below the levels at which it can be proved that harm results to people or the environment. Understand that in most cases, we were polluting at the low ppm range and treating it down to the low to mid ppb range. In one case that comes to mind, our "wastewater" going into the river was cleaner than the river water coming into the plant upstream of our effluent pipe. :-/
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
9104 Posts |
The other part of the equation. When the polio vaccine saved one in 1000, it would have been worth $1000 a shot. It's hardly worth a million $ to save one life every 10,000 years.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3670 Posts |
The ironic part of that story about polio, is Rockefeller (I believe we have mentioned his name and "big banks" in same sentence a time or two) created the foundation where Jonas Salk discovered the polio vaccine.... He was about to die of unknown disease, could not eat they say, hair fell out at like age 53 and had been greedy all that time doing nothing with his money and power to help change the world. After making a spiritual decision to change not just the world for the better but himself, he got better and lived be like 98 years old, as well as start that foundation above. Makes you wanna look up to the sky, and tilt your head and shrug your shoulders eh.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller
Edited by Silverhawk74 07/23/2011 03:50 am
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,602 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.45 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|
| |
| |