| Author |
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,006 |
|
|
|
New Member
 United States
49 Posts |
Yeah, my next question was going to be about storage. I've seen the 7070 mentioned a lot around the forum, and I'll probably get one a little later. Right now I'm looking more for storage for the Jeffersons and Kennedys. Also, I've seen Harris, Dansco, Whitman, and other folders/binders/albums mentioned ... what are the main differences? Why would I pick one type over another?
The 7070 looks a bit overwhelming for now, any suggestions for a simpler Type set? Maybe 1900 to present or 1900-2000 or something like that ...?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
I have Dansco for my Nickels and Pennies, too. I like the fact that you can see both sides of the coin. (There are plastic viewing windows on both sides so you can see the coin but not worry about fingerprints). The slip case claims to protect the coins further. Don't know if that's real or hype, but it makes sense to use a slip cover. Other folks can explain the advantages of what they use. As far as a simpler type set, you can look at the Dansco pages and at least get an idea of what you want to collect. I don't know if there is a 20th Century Type set album or folder available, but if not you can simply collect them in 2x2s and Eagle Coin Holders makes an album that displays 2x2s. Then you could define the types yourself. Some of the Dansco type differences seem trivial to me while others seem missing. For example, why do I need a 1909 VDB? That is a much more subtle difference than some of the nickel variations that are omitted. Dansco has a slot for the pre '65 dime, quarter and half (90% silver) but ignores the change from copper to copper plated zinc in the pennies. If you are defining what should be included you can have exactly what you want, which is nice. A Red Book can help tremendously in helping you decide what you want to include in a Type Set.
Edited by larsdog 07/12/2012 4:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
the folder is good to start with, I filled it pretty quickly--the 7070 is pretty hard to fill--Ive been working on it around 2 years and there are some that are expensive--good luck bud
Retired USAF 1983-2003
|
|
New Member
 United States
49 Posts |
That Harris folder looks perfect. I'll have to get me a " Red Book". I like the idea of being able to see both sides of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
Quote: Harris 20th Century Type set folder.... Well it's nice to know that exists. Thanks for sharing the link! That would be a GREAT way to get started on a Type Set!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
Quote: Nice 7070, larsdog! Thanks jbuck and others. I'm really just getting started. My plan is to get everything except the old coppers, capped bust, and seated liberty silver (including the Trade dollar). I already have one old copper and a Seated Liberty dime, but those were accidents. I WAY underbid on an auction and got lucky. My collection isn't really too much different from the 20th Century Type set that harthag is going for except for a few early pennies and nickels, one dime, and the 2c and 3c coins. I just like the idea of having the spots there when I finally decide to push back into the 19th Century.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1116 Posts |
I also would recommend the State Quarters and Territories set. I've completed a complete set in a Whitman album for just the Philadelphia and Denver mintmarks from circulation. However, I did find finding the 2009 territories the hardest out of the complete set. If you don't get frustrated it is very doable. I found the vast majority of these coins in just ten rolls of quarters. I was so happy about completing that set that I am now working on the complete set including the silver proofs and uncirculated coins. The only drawback to this collections is that I need to purchase 3 Dansco albums. Another recommendation for a circulating set would be a set of circulating quarters from 1965 to the start of the State sets. The real nice thing about this suggestion is that the quarters that are not needed for the state set will make a nice start for this album. Sort of like killing two birds with one stone. What you don't need for one album will most likely be needed for the other.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1116 Posts |
The reason that I did the Whitman folding is that it is nice and compact. With the State Quarters you really only need to see one side of the coin, the other side is the same for every coin. If space is a problem there is a work around. I have a few different types of folders for my coins. In addition to the Whitman folding albums, I have the following Dansco type albums - Dansco itself for most of my needs, but for the Liberty Walking halves I have a Whitman and for the Franklins I have an Intercept Shield. All of these are in different price ranges, so the field is really up to your requirements and cost preference.
|
|
New Member
 United States
49 Posts |
Quote: I just like the idea of having the spots there when I finally decide to push back into the 19th Century. That's a good idea larsdog, I do plan on expanding beyond my initial 1900 - present goal. Maybe I'll get the 7070 and simply start with the present and work backwords and just see how far back I can get.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
It's up to you, but that Harris folder looks nice, too. Isn't this fun?!?
|
|
New Member
United States
31 Posts |
Gotta ask about your forum name, I know where I got mine from & have been using this since the middle 90's but never seen anyone else use it. I assume Magic the Gathering?
|
|
New Member
 United States
49 Posts |
You assume correctly, and I've been using it about that long too. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
If I were to start a collection of coins, two alternative would appear to be attrextive to me a): Quarters. The largest commonly circulating coin I would start by collecting coins from circulation, then as this became increasingly more difficult, I would start buying to expand my collection. The initial purchases would be relatively cheap but at the collection grows the sky could be the limit in terms of how much you can afford to pay, and to what extent you wish the collection to grow. This sort of effort can expand into a lifetme project.
b): Type set. Most Americans are patriotic. Numismatically a description of American coinage history in coins whould make a solid statement. How far back you wish to go is almost the same as with quarters: the sky is the limit.
I have a variety about 200 American coins of all denominations and metals, extending back in date about 200 years, grades ranging from F to MS63. They are part of a World coin collection.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
I'll agree with most that you should go with Jefferson nickels first. Then second any Lincoln Cent collection. However, I'd get rid of the usage of Folders. They cost much more but are more fun and safer to use Albums. Way to many problems with Folders. I also would say keep away from any type sets for now. You suggested you want to try for as much as possible from circulation and with any type set, only a fraction of the coins required can be found in change. For ease of finding in change, also try for quarters. You can find many of the ones prior to the State Quarters in chanage most of the time. A collection of those State Quarters took, can be done mostly from change. As one more suggestion, try to accumulate the Roosevelt dimes. Many of the older ones may be difficult since they were partially Silver so all now taken out of change.
|
| |
Replies: 36 / Views: 4,006 |