| Author |
Replies: 49 / Views: 6,615 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
It seems difficult to find an authoritative source, probably because vending machine people don't want their exact secrets known, but from what I've found today it seems like at least some machines have a ferromagnetic device to weed out those counterfeits, and then also read the EM signature which is compared with known good signatures, as well as reading the coin's diameter, and then speed determination on top of that to separate into denomination buckets. Some of them skip the ferromagnetic part and only use EM signature. The difference with what @publius posted above is that these sources are saying that the EM signature is compared against known good ones digitally. Technology they didn't have in 1965 of course.
On the Thai coins, I think only the 2 and 5 baht are clad in the modern era. Similar to US dimes and quarters. The 2 baht also came in nickel-plated steel and copper-aluminium-nickel. The 1 and 10 baht are not clad. I don't think I've ever seen a vending machine in Thailand. My spouse says they've started showing up in the last 5 years or so. So if that wasn't a factor in their coin composition, why did Thailand decide on clad? Maybe banks use a similar technology to sort out fakes.
|
|
Moderator
  Australia
16837 Posts |
Quote: Sap, any word in your reference about nickels? If nickels also land in the correct bucket, with silver and clad, the mint could have used the nickel's alloy for higher denominations. Since the composition of the nickel wasn't mooted for changing, there isn't much talk of nickels in the Report. It does mention that of the two favoured replacement-silver options (clad, and solid cupronickel), that solid cupronickel would be quicker, easier and simpler for the Mint to adopt, because it was already experienced in working with cupronickel coinage for the nickel. This advantage was overrruled, due to the vending machine concern. As for nickels in vending machines, each denomination the machine accepted would presumably have had a separate track, and separate collector buckets for each denomination. I don't think they used eddy current discriminators on the nickel track at all. Counterfeits weren't as major a concern with nickels (which is why, of course, that Mr Henning made such a killing with them), so the tests were more rudimentary. Nickels also were already a "non-homogeneous coinage", since War Nickels were still around in the 1960s; the vending machines would have had to be designed to accept both cupronickel nickels and war-silver nickels. War Nickels and cupronickel nickels both weigh exactly the same. So if the coin was the correct weight and size for a nickel, it was a nickel as far as the machine was concerned, no further questions asked.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54282 Posts |
Quote: This advantage was overrruled, due to the vending machine concern. Do you know what the "concern" was?
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
|
|
Moderator
  Australia
16837 Posts |
Yes - that solid cupronickel couldn't be made to work in the eddy current discriminators for dimes and quarters and they would all need to be physically removed, bypassed, or replaced with some other discrimination equipment.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7276 Posts |
Great thread!
I learned a lot!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
For further information and some original sources I'd recommend The United States Clad Coinage" 1992 by Ginger Rapsus. It does a good job of setting the tone of the era and the thinking of the principles of that time. There were alternatives and some were probably much better (such as a nickel alloy) but clads are a result of committee thinking and government. While base metal was the reason I had no interest in this "garbage" when it was new, at least it was very high tech and a good compromise among the various interests. Silver is obviously too expensive for usage as small change and enough deflation to keep 1964 quarters in circulation would have been even more devastating to the economy than the inflation that has pushed them up to $4.50
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts |
Great stuff, I've wondered about this topic for decades, a heartfelt thanks to the various posters who filled in details.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188770 Posts |
A very interesting discussion with plenty of information. Worthy of a bookmark. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4593 Posts |
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Quote:Everything and more than you wanted to know about the traditional US payphone except the coin acceptor piece we're worried about here: http://dougkerr.net/Pumpkin/article...ditional.pdfand https://www.smithsonianmag.com/hist...e-180952727/ It turned out that the coin rejectors made for telephones didn't work especially in Illinois because people discovered they could easily pound a piece of lead into nearly worthless amusement tokens and they would pass for a nickel. This led to coin slots on phones that were made to accept only a very oddly shaped disc of metal that callers had to purchase from the establishment which operated the phone. The amusement tokens filled with lead are referred to as "plug nickels". Most of these telephone tokens were made from the 1910's to the 1930's and most seen have significant wear. Some are rarely seen in Unc or AU condition. Many were melted in the scrap drives of WW II. Most were made in batches of 1000 but some were in larger orders. Many types are quite scarce. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telephone...es&ia=images
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
Edited by cladking 08/30/2023 4:10 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Huh! I just discovered that Numista has a section on US telephone tokens and there's a very inactive club on the net for them. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/in...&ttte=y&p=10Curiously Numista lists only about 20 different tokens and not all of them are common issues. There are several hundred different Illinois telephone tokens including reorders. There's even one for the World's Fair which for some unknown reason is quite uncommon. Vending machines and other coin operated machines have been a big part of the US economy for over a century. Nickelodeons were common back in the 1890's. These were parlors that changed your nickels into amusement tokens which are another very difficult collectible.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
807 Posts |
The telephone tokens with the grooves were widely used in Europe after the Second World War. I have one (probably an amusement arcade token, with the mystifying text "Galaxy World" and a crude illustration of a ringed planet, not listed on Numista yet so I'll probably try to add it) in my collection of space-related coins, tokens, and exonumia.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
Quote: The telephone tokens with the grooves were widely used in Europe after the Second World War. I have one (probably an amusement arcade token, with the mystifying text "Galaxy World" and a crude illustration of a ringed planet, not listed on Numista yet so I'll probably try to add it) in my collection of space-related coins, tokens, and exonumia. I've seen this token. I don't know anything about it if it's the same one I've seen but I classify the cu/ ni version as a modern NJ amusement token because of the name. IMS it says "good for one play" on it.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
807 Posts |
Quote: I've seen this token. I don't know anything about it if it's the same one I've seen but I classify the cu/ ni version as a modern NJ amusement token because of the name. IMS it says "good for one play" on it. The one I have is yellow (presumably brass, non-magnetic) and has no text aside from "Galaxy World". All the designs are incuse outlines.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2271 Posts |
OK. I found it.
I have three different ones that are incuse and have two grooves on the back. two have the number "16" in the middle and are more common than the version with no number. In aggregate there are 9 tokens from this source. I know little about them except they are modern amusement (arcade) tokens and likely New Jersey. The previous owner of one of them like yours identified one as GBD/ M-UNID but I don't recognize his categorization system.
Alpert and Smith list it in "modern unidentified" as GBD B 23 Sd. There are lots of young people who have been working on these since the days I was in the loop.
There are a lot of opportunities in 20th century tokens and lots and lots of rarities. Entrance costs are nominal and educational opportunities extreme. Most of my collections are for sale. But even acquiring these tokens one at a time is still very easy and inexpensive. Nobody really knows the common issues from the rare.
The mind boggles at the numbers of tokens and clad coins that have been through the machines. Most of those old clad quarters have been through a machine dozens and dozens and dozens of times and through counting machines thousands of times. It's a wonder there are any old clads left in circulation at all since they were designed to last only thirty years. They have greatly exceeded expectations because they are so durable most are lost or destroyed before they have a chance to wear out.
Time don't fly, it bounds and leaps.
|
| |
Replies: 49 / Views: 6,615 |