Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1964 'Accented Hair's Little Brother' - T2o-T1R

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 70 / Views: 15,779Next Topic
Page: of 5
Pillar of the Community
rupester's Avatar
United States
1300 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2014  2:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add rupester to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Atsinger, DDO fs-103 has the RDV-002 and RPM#6 not sure if you have looked into variety vista but it is a great site for information its a awesome site
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2014  5:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Atsinger, DDO fs-103 has the RDV-002 and RPM#6 not sure if you have looked into variety vista but it is a great site for information its a awesome site
I will try and check it out for sure.

The posts about the 1st reverse kind of bring a question up for those reading this and saying to themselves "what is the big deal?" If as some have mentioned there was a Type 1 Obverse with a Type 2 reverse, then that would be the rare one. I whole hardheartedly agree but it proves one point in my research. So far one has not turned up, which by statistical odds means there is not one. It proves when the Type 1 obverse was pulled from the press that only a brief period existed when the mint continued to use the Type 1 reverse. I can not prove it but I did find the quote which stated it lasts about 20% longer than the obverse. If that is even close, then if only 100,000 AH coins were made then there should only be around 20,000 of these. I think they are more rare. This is only for the proofs though.
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2014  7:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From what I can figure there were 4 different Kennedy half reverses.
At least ones that I have seen. These include proofs and business strikes. Strt. G/Broken rays, Strt. G/Strt. rays, Serif G/Broken rays
and Serif G/Strt. rays. Just looked at my 1968 and 1969 proof sets.
These both have Strt. G's and Strt. Rays. (so far anyway). Also checked out a few rolls of my 40% business strikes. A mix of reverses there. Seems like the type 1 rev. was used quite a bit on at least the business strikes. 40%'ers anyway. Maybe they just used the type 1 proof until it was worn out on business strikes. Not sure what was used after 1970.
Never bothered to look. The OP's math seems to work out as it is close to my own on approx. how many trans. were minted. But still just a guess. Out of approx. 75 to 125K ACH's minted which leaves
about 3.8 million (i think:) proofs left could be as much as half of those were trans. ? Someone out there must have more info on the numbers or maybe no one cared to check it out. Poor old Kennedy half dollar.
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/22/2014  9:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The OP's math seems to work out as it is close to my own on approx. how many trans. were minted. But still just a guess. Out of approx. 75 to 125K ACH's minted which leaves
about 3.8 million (i think:) proofs left could be as much as half of those were trans. ? Someone out there must have more info on the numbers or maybe no one cared to check it out.


I think the math works out and what folks have found so far leads me to believe it is in the ballpark.

I think it is important that no Typ1 Obverse has been found with a Typ2 reverse. When they pulled it, it was done and all AH were done that way. The question is how long did they use that one Typ1 Reverse die until they put in the Typ2?

I assume it is far less than 50K at the max, does anyone have any idea how often they change dies? Especially considering it was a proof.
Edited by eSinger
05/22/2014 9:12 pm
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/24/2014  12:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Reading a good book about die usage in these time, cam across the 1952 Superbird Quarter. Now that is neat!
Pillar of the Community
Indian1's Avatar
United States
3640 Posts
 Posted 05/24/2014  09:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Indian1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
They have used proof reverse dies on business strike coins
for years. 9 years on the type B Wash. quarter as an example.

Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/24/2014  09:57 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Ah that explains it then. Now I just have to get an estimate of how many 'strikes' there were. As an example, if 100K were made, and dies are good for 10K strikes, then it would presume to be 9 sets of TY1OBV/TYP1REV,then at some point the obverse was pulled. That does not mean they stopped using the TYP1 Reverse though. I will never know exactly but it sure is fun trying to figure it out.
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2014  5:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Well I came across some numbers that are relevant.


Quote:
As to some reasonably hard production numbers, here is part of a 1972 US Mint report on average obverse die production for the various 1971 coins (the reverse dies lasted about 20% longer):

One Cent 1,000,000
Five Cent 170,000
Twenty Five Cent 155,000
Fifty Cent 150,000
One Dollar 100,000



http://www.ikegroup.info/?page_id=950

Now in this case it is clad which is harder on dies but it puts in the ballpark what is needed. Lets say silver is 50% longer as it is softer, therefore 150,000 per die can become 225,000. If we know that ~100,000 AH's were minted then in this case they could mint another 100,000. This would be for the Obverse die only...so this leads to more of these 'little brothers' than the original figures suggest. Hmm
Edited by eSinger
05/25/2014 5:37 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2014  8:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jmkendall to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
How very interesting! The only thing I have to add is that I think you numbers being melted in the last 5 years are way off. From late 2009 until early 2013 coins were being shipped off to be melted two to three times a week. I'm a dealer and I can tell you that anything minted after 1958 became fair game for the melting pot. I personally know of several thousand silver mint sets that were broken up and melted. I used to buy the cents and nickels from a couple of other dealers for face value after they were broken out of the sets. I had a few HUNDRED rolls of proof cents and nickels. Now multiply that across the nation and I think you will see what happened. My take has always been that when the dust settles we are going to see some major number changes in the silver proof sets. And discover some real rarities in the years to come. It has been well over a year since anyone has come in to offer me a Franklin Proof set. And I used to have boxes of them, they were so common.
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2014  8:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
True and that is not even counting the big melt off in 1980. I truly think these Accented Hair little brothers will be attributed and collectible at some point, especially if they do away with the Kennedy half.
Valued Member
kkirby99's Avatar
United States
231 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2014  9:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kkirby99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
As anecdotal evidence....

I have a number of these transitional proof Kennedy halves. I recently bought a roll of 64 Proof Kennedys and there were 12 of the transitional variety out of the 20. A previous roll I purchased had 5. Low sample number but they may not be as rare as the AH. The only way to reconcile this is to assume that the number of AH's out there are much less than the 100,000 that is generally thought.

Also in regards to that 64-D that is for sale at Heritage, the higher star of the two stars along the ray does not completely block out the ray as it does in the proofs. I'm not convinced that it is an older proof reverse die that was used in Denver, just an anomaly in the reverse dies that Denver had. Plus there would be no reason to ship proof reverse dies across the country to the branch mints.
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/25/2014  10:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I recently bought a roll of 64 Proof Kennedys and there were 12 of the transitional variety out of the 20. A previous roll I purchased had 5. Low sample number but they may not be as rare as the AH.


Well that is not good. My take was 2 out of about 20-25 of them. (64 Proofs)



Quote:
The only way to reconcile this is to assume that the number of AH's out there are much less than the 100,000 that is generally thought.


How would that explain it? I have seen the 100k number used but I guess I do not follow what significance it would mean if the Accented Hair mintage was much less. That would make the case for even less of these right?




Quote:
Also in regards to that 64-D that is for sale at Heritage, the higher star of the two stars along the ray does not completely block out the ray as it does in the proofs.


So they are NOT the same. Interesting indeed.



Quote:
I'm not convinced that it is an older proof reverse die that was used in Denver, just an anomaly in the reverse dies that Denver had. Plus there would be no reason to ship proof reverse dies across the country to the branch mints.



I wondered why they would do that, but I know they were scrambling at the time to get them out due to demand both proof and circulation strikes.

Good Feedback sir.
Edited by eSinger
05/25/2014 10:07 pm
Valued Member
kkirby99's Avatar
United States
231 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2014  04:58 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kkirby99 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If there were fewer AH's than 100,000 minted, the reverse dies could have been used on a lot more transitional coins than you've figured. Taking your example from above if 100,000 Ah's were minted and the reverse dies were good for another 30% or so making a total of 130,000 units combined of AH and transitional. If the accepted number of AH's are less than 100,000 (possibly a lot less) than it would stand to reason that the transitional mintage could be 3-4 x the AH mintage, say 30,000 AH to 100,000 transitional. Personally I believe that there are a lot more than 130,000 proofs out there with the 1st reverse die.
Edited by kkirby99
05/26/2014 05:00 am
Valued Member
pcunix's Avatar
United States
58 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2014  06:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pcunix to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The related question is whether there are 30,000 or a half million, how does that match up against collector demand? How many Kennedy collectors are there and how many of those care about transitional proof varieties? I have no idea, but I'd guess it's a pretty small number.
Pillar of the Community
eSinger's Avatar
United States
523 Posts
 Posted 05/26/2014  09:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add eSinger to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If the accepted number of AH's are less than 100,000 (possibly a lot less) than it would stand to reason that the transitional mintage could be 3-4 x the AH mintage, say 30,000 AH to 100,000 transitional. Personally I believe that there are a lot more than 130,000 proofs out there with the 1st reverse die.


Makes sense, now I get what you are saying. I am beginning to think there might be more also even if the Kennedy Book says less so. I wonder how many AH were melted?


Quote:
The related question is whether there are 30,000 or a half million, how does that match up against collector demand? How many Kennedy collectors are there and how many of those care about transitional proof varieties? I have no idea, but I'd guess it's a pretty small number.


Very good point, but the AH popularity is there I guess because of the story and low mintage. True collectors might not be interested in general but that could change, specifically if the do away with the half dollar at some point. I just hope by rarity alone it would be worth something, and if it gets recognized as such. There are a few Kennedy half collectors myself being one of them but in no way are there near the same number as say penny collectors.
Edited by eSinger
05/26/2014 09:06 am
  Previous TopicReplies: 70 / Views: 15,779Next Topic
Page: of 5

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.41 seconds to rattle this change. Forums