| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,387 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
I would say keep the coins in it and don't upgrade because your family member (chosed? Is chosed a word?) those coins to be in it. Very very awesome set you have there. Super it has the 1909 s vdb too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1476 Posts |
 Maybe it's "had chosen to include" ?  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
"Chose" works just fine. It is, after all, the past tense of the word. OK, Cascade, I'm happy with the Big One as Die Pair 4. How'd he manage to get it clipped only on the reverse? Yes, I know what that is.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2589 Posts |
Don't forget to check the 1992's for CAMS, and the 1999 for WAM
|
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
Very nice set of coins. I like pennies.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
I'm working on a lincoln dansco as well, without proof issues though. So far so good, working on all the pieces to grade VF+
Currently looking for a VF+ authentic graded by PCGS 1914 D and 1909 SVDB
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189112 Posts |
Quote: Back off there, just carl...you've taken more than your share of nice Lincolns off the market! And Mercury dimes.  Quote: I would say keep the coins in it and don't upgrade because your family member [chose] those coins to be in it. I agree. There is a sentimental value attached to that notion. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
Yup, I already had that notion on the albums I keep and to mark the coins already there... My fear with this whole thing lies in missing high premium varieties. Better dates, grades and keys I can jump around series on with little stumble. But the varieties, geeze. That's a whole different beast. I don't want to take a 3-4 figure loss on a coin due to my ignorance. But I'm not there yet, that's phase 4 and I'm still only just broaching phase 1
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12844 Posts |
 I'm totally on board with the 'leave as-is' notion. You can build your personal sets however you like but I feel you're honoring the person that put the set together by conserving/preserving rather than making any changes.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
2668 Posts |
Dude! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
Congrats on a great collection! I admit if I were you though I would put the folder-held LCMs in an album. I lost too many good coins to the Whitman folders. Despite what I thought was airtight storage years ago, evidently there was moisture in the cardboard of the folders that made the REVs lose their luster 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5208 Posts |
That is an awesome set to have inherited. Quote: I would say keep the coins in it and don't upgrade because your family member (chosed? Is chosed a word?) those coins to be in it. I agree keep the coins together. My grandfather gave me a cookie tin full of wheats when I has 10 or so and a couple of Whitman folders. Unfortunately they got mixed in with other wheats and upgrades over the next couple of years. When I got back into collecting a couple of years ago and started filling albums all of the coins I had as a kid now lost their provenance. I had 2 SLQ's. 1 was a pre 1925 and the other one I can remember because of the circulated cameo. I had is slabbed so I wouldn't lose it in the mix int he future. Who slabs a G4 1923 SLQ worth $10? Someone who doesn't want to misplace it ever again. That is why I bought this 1927 a few years ago when I saw it. It must have meant something to someone otherwise they would not have paid to have it slabbed. 
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,387 |