| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,314 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
498 Posts |
I thought I posted this one before but can't find it and these are better pictures. I think au58 maybe ms 60. All opinions are appriaciated.  
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Not enough to take me out of Slider status. I'm tending to expect weaker strikes from Philadelphia by then, if only because of Master wear. Note the halo around the obverse stars where circulation handling didn't efface the luster - this may not make 58 even.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
I'm not sure if it circulated, but I concur it does look to have been poorly handled, hence what looks to be impaired luster.
Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Too many hits on the reverse field, which is otherwise usually really clean on MS. So I'll say mid AU.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
 AU-55
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36832 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
498 Posts |
Finally sent to ngc and got Au 55 original sold last night for $699.00 not bad for $200 plus $30 grading and shipping. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8517 Posts |
Winner winner...  ...chicken dinner !
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
 Well played Mikey!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
I was thinking AU from the pics. Nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
1901 is a hard coin to find in mint state still they go for several hundred to more in mid to high AU nice score
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,314 |
|