| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 2,221 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
84 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
824 Posts |
Looking at those pictures I would say no.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
No. John1  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
449 Posts |
Sometimes (more often than not) your eyes see what you want them to see. If I think about it hard enough I can start to see what looks like a D, but I agree this is not a 1914-D.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
Even if it was a 1914-D, from those pictures, it would be so eroded and "beat up" that it wouldn't be worth much. By the way, did you find that by CRH'ing?
Edited by MichioKaku
09/16/2015 11:33 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
No, it is not a 1914-D.
Even if that was a mint mark, it is in the wrong location to be a genuine 1914-D.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
103 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10029 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
United States
16677 Posts |
Wrong placement of "anomoly" which appears like a PMD hit of some kind. swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Definitely not a '14-D. Agree that rhe so-called mintmark is in the wrong position.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
98 Posts |
Sorry to disappoint but it is not a 1914-D. The gouge running vertically directly below the 1 is too long to be the left side of a D mint mark and that makes it an illusion.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
84 Posts |
No problem, and thanks for your input. It was a long shot, but it did catch my eye!
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 2,221 |
|
Posted 09/16/2015 07:42 am
