| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,758 |
|
Valued Member
100 Posts |
I think this one could go MS  *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
This piece looks AU with potential surface issues. I would not spend the money to certify it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Au55 maybe details....I agree with possible surface issues.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
In the pics it looks like someone, not knowing it would ruin much of the value of the coin, used a pencil eraser on it to make the surfaces look "better." I hope its just the pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Not worth the grading cost. AU details CLEANED
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
This would have been a decent coin if it wasn't messed with. AU-Questionable color.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree. Looks dull and cleaned in some way.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Coin may have been lightly buffed but, still nice key date coin, high AU
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
AU...color is off, but might be the lighting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1963 Posts |
Don't send. Not worth the money for grading. It looks cleaned, and I see wear.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15469 Posts |
Concur with the others ... this at best an AU-Details coin at PCGS. That said ... still a nice key date ... appreciate it for what it is ... submitting to any TPG would be a loss of money. David
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18684 Posts |
AU details. Coin was cleaned. All the original luster has been stripped away. Not worth slabbing
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4541 Posts |
I think ef-45 with possible cleaning
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,758 |