| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,231 |
|
|
New Member
United States
37 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
the top picture is very small, but it does appear to be SD on top and LD on bottom. Nice finds 
|
|
New Member
 United States
37 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
 to the forum! Here is a screen shot from lincolncentsonline.com 
Edited by cwb 02/10/2017 01:02 am
|
|
New Member
 United States
37 Posts |
Thank you , I'm updating the photo.
|
|
New Member
 United States
37 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
Nice job with the new picture. The 1960, 1960D large dates and the 1960D small date are the common coins. The 1960 small date is very hard to find in circulation as is the 1970S small date. Welcome to the mix!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
These are both large dates.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Really? They looked like a lg and sm to me too hmm? Pacun can you get clearer pics of the dates?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
I am 99.999 sure OP has a both a small dt. and a large dt. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54282 Posts |
I don't usually disagree with coop, but in your second post, the photo shows you have a small date on the left and a large date on the right. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I have to agree with you now. The fist double image you posted, looked like a pair of large dates. But I was using a phone to view them instead of my computer. The tails on the 9 and 6's looked the same when I view them on the phone. Not I see they are not the same.
|
|
New Member
 United States
37 Posts |
Thank you for you'r opinionated opinions. Much appreciated.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,231 |
|