Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1916 D Cent Lamination Error?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 1,363Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Mayflower2020's Avatar
United States
624 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:18 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Mayflower2020 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year / Mintmark / Denomination to Title. Titles are Important! ***

Going through some teen wheats, and stumbled upon this guy. I assume it's a lamination error based on my time here on the forum. But wanted to run it by my dear friends.

1916-D-Cent-Lamination-Error?
1916-D-Cent-Lamination-Error?
Moderator
Learn More...
Fuzzy317's Avatar
United States
14463 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:20 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Fuzzy317 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You should include the date, mintmark, and the denomination in your titles.

Why Topic Titles are Important

The title of your topic is very important. Let's say you need help attributing an 1896 Morgan Dollar....

  • Horrendous: Help!

  • Bad: Need help with coin

  • Better: Need help with Morgan Dollar

  • Good: Need help with 1896 Morgan Dollar

  • Awesome: Need help with VAM on 1896 Morgan Dollar


This enables the members with expertise pertaining to your question to easily find and answer your question. The title of the topic also becomes the title of the topic's web page, which enables us to attract more collectors to the site. The more members we have, the more we learn.
Moderator
Learn More...
Spence's Avatar
United States
34410 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@MF, my first thought is that this is a lam, but I'll be interested to hear what others say about this one. We recently had a coin posted on CCF with what may have been a lamination, but still had details of the design under peeled away layer. This one seems to have a similar look.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb

"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
Pillar of the Community
Mark1959's Avatar
7234 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mark1959 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The strike is nice so maybe lam peel from a planchet then struck?
Pillar of the Community
USSID18's Avatar
5464 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add USSID18 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking more like struck through or some type of planchet problem. Show both sides of the coin when you post.
Pillar of the Community
CoinCents's Avatar
United States
3656 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  8:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinCents to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I agree with lamination - usually you will have the details visible once the lamination has peeled away. It also appears to be a "Woody" - aka incorrect alloy mix.

When you have a " Greaser" - Grease Filled Die you would not be able to see the details.

Also, as Fuzzy mentioned about your topic title - I do a lot of research on the coins and having all the specifics in the Title really helps me locate what I need.
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3647 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  9:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agree, lamination.

I've gone through my entire junk box of 1916-D cents in the last few weeks, and I'm always amazed at just how bad the copper alloy and planchets were on these coins.
Pillar of the Community
Mayflower2020's Avatar
United States
624 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  9:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mayflower2020 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks everybody. Sorry about not putting cent in the title.
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  9:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A nice find. That is a rough peel.
Bedrock of the Community
Errers and Varietys's Avatar
United States
74197 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  9:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Errers and Varietys to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yep a error combination. It's a Improper Alloy Mix and a Lamination error. I think Improper Alloy Mix errors can cause Lamination errors.
Errers and Varietys.
Pillar of the Community
cwb's Avatar
United States
3463 Posts
 Posted 01/11/2018  10:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cwb to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice one!
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
spru's Avatar
United States
12477 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2018  02:44 am  Show Profile   Check spru's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add spru to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Yep a error combination. It's a Improper Alloy Mix and a Lamination error. I think Improper Alloy Mix errors can cause Lamination errors.


Not necessarily an Improper Alloy, but improper mixing. This is indeed a lamination (or delamination) error. The peel will most often not remove all vestiges of the devices underneath. That would require a very deep flaw in the alloy.

Many times, the expected devices will be affected in a very minor way. I think this is what is seen here.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
Valued Member
Mckinley_4th's Avatar
United States
68 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2018  05:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Mckinley_4th to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think so too! Pretty cool!
Bedrock of the Community
Coinfrog's Avatar
United States
94367 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2018  1:18 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Great lam, good eye!
Pillar of the Community
MrPink2018's Avatar
United States
2470 Posts
 Posted 01/12/2018  1:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MrPink2018 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
good catch!
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 01/13/2018  3:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I feel this is a lamination. Why? But note the motto still shows through. If this were a struck through error, changes are it would have removed the ghost letters. It is in line with the woody affect of the coin. The coin looks like it was polished and even the peel area looks like it was polished a bit weakening the lines that were present there. Still a nice coin that would be a great hole filler until you get a better example. But still an error to hang onto.
  Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 1,363Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to rattle this change. Forums