| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,193 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
244 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Lots of glare,but it looks like MD or a worn die to me. Not a doubled die,sorry. Give it a bit and more members will chime in. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
536 Posts |
My vote is Die Deterioration Doubling. It looks like all the doubling is going towards the edge. You can also see some of the flow marks in the fields.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
 with DDD. But I can certainly see why you asked.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189185 Posts |
 to the Community!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The strange thing about Machine Doubling is that it has not rules. (kind of a traffic accident happening) It can alter some devices one way and the next one a different way. No rules for them. Just depends on how the machine makes it swing. All images are from coins from the same die pair. (note the same die marker on each coin)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
244 Posts |
DDD? I've never heard of this? What is the difference between DDD and DD?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
244 Posts |
But it's still a form of doubling? lol
P.S. Thank you all for your help! There are so many different types of errors, it's rather difficult to distinguishing the difference between errors, doubling, glares.... and when I look at them too long, the errors my brain creates haha
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Keep looking!  to the CCF!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Some call it doubling. I don't. It is die wear on a single squeeze die. It forms on the field, not on the devices. Not a doubled die. No premium for this. Just the die showing its age.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,193 |
|