I put the below in quotes because I previously posted it in a different topic, but thinking it applies here as well.
Quote:Because it resembles one, I think it will qualify as a rim
Cud by the cud-on-coins guide lines. Note: I see none listed like it for this year and mint.
To qualify as a rim
Cud by my guide lines is another story. If the strike is misaligned or a worn collar is present, it often produces a false rim. Sometimes it fills in completely and sometimes partially resembling a rim
Cud.
A rim
Cud is produced when the recessed design rim has chipped or broken away from the outer recessed edge of the die. The coins material will then try and fill the added cavity during the strike.
1.52mm is the US Mints specs for a cent thickness. I know most any roll of cents will show a variety of rim thicknesses, but you're less likely to see the thickness exceed that unless something has altered the strike or the die(s).
So I always ask myself, before qualifying:
1. Does it rise above the normal design rim? Taking in account the design rim as a whole regardless of thickness.
2. Is there an identical rim
Cud already listed with similar pick up points? To have more than one show up from the same die, would for sure aid in the confirmation.
A
Rim Fin is something of a different nature. Material that extends out from a gap between the collar and one of the other die or dies. The odds of a
Rim Fin folding over in the exact form of the design rim after strike is, well sorry I don't have time to count that high.
Thanks, Doug.
To continue with your coin here, I'm trying to confirm the collar was intact or not showing signs of any wide collar issues. The misaligned die does not seem severe enough to cause the containment breach seen 180° opposite the suspected rim
.
I'm thinking on the breech side, that is a lot of material that flowed out between the obverse die and collar gap causing the overall weakness in the field. The suspected rim
side shows a false rim or rim gutter on both sides of it commonly seen with misalignments and or collar issues.
Is the diameter normal (19.05) all around. Also does the suspected rim
exceed the US Mints 1.52mm thickness specs? Thanks, Doug.
edit: fixing typo's.....