| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,360 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
Trying with acetone wouldn't hurt it, so I would try. Just make sure it's 100% pure acetone.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
I agree, pure acetone should not harm it, but yes it is minute and I can't say from the pics if that is what it is. I would call it a AU55. The breast feathers look flat. The S minted Morgans usually had a good strike. Also, it might be the quality of the pics but I also question if it had been cleaned before because it looks a little buffed. But this may be unlikely if it has that nice cartwheel that you mention.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Sorry pics are to small to grade from , acetone should not hurt the coin but if it is PVC it may help to keep it from spreading .
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
the pics are a little small and looks like the white balance needs to be set but from what I can see it looks like it could be polished but I am not comfortable saying it for a fact without bigger pictures
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6381 Posts |
Hi Chuckster, I'm with Dom on an AU grade. The luster looks strong around the obverse and reverse legends but becomes relatively dull in the fields, probably from brief circulation. The lack of detail on the eagle's breast feathers adds to my opinion that it's not mint state.
Go for the acetone rinse. Can't hurt, might help!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Thanks for all the responses!- Appreciate it. I'll definitely clean off the PVC with pure acetone. Here are some new pic's up close to help with any grading questions. Shows better details regarding the eagles breast feathers etc and the possibility of this coin being polished. I'm no expert on this at all, but from what I have seen and read, in my opinion, I don't think this coin was polished. It does have a nice hour/glass cartwheel when I rotate it in the light, but that's not to say that maybe it was polished at one time, but I think there is too much detail that makes me think this was not polished and its closer to a MS grade. That said,anything is possible, I'm not the ORIGINAL owner of this coin (1897). Getting up there in age, but not that old! Image: Set21897sjpeg4.jpg62.88 KB Image: Set21897sjpeg5.jpg66.48 KB Image: Set21897sjpeg6.jpg43.2 KB Image: Set21897sjpeg1.jpg74.43 KB Image: Set21897sjpeg2.jpg70.67 KB Image: Set21897sjpeg3.jpg61.54 KB
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
As a newbe to Morgan's.....Just started my collection a year ago....I would really like to hear what everyone thinks of this coins grading with the better pics !! The hair lines and breast feathers are pretty strong to this inexperienced eye....
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
SuperDave;
I'm going to say the first one is the MS63 and the second one is the AU58 I'm basing it more on the condition of the Denticles/Rim, although if I were grading them, I can't see either one being a MS63.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: I'm going to say the first one is the MS63 and the second one is the AU58 Nope. Other way around. This is just to illustrate the difficulty of grading from photographs; in-hand, I suspect that the AU58 coin would be easier to tell. How does this apply to your 1897? Well, based on what I see in the photos, the coin could be AU58 or a strong MS63. You just can't tell without the ability to see how the luster plays under the light, especially on the eagle's breast, above the ear and on the cheek. My guess is your coin is Mint State.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
The coin looks MS62 to me. As for SuperDave's little quiz (I didn't look at the answer yet) I'll say the top is AU, bottom MS.
Clue: It's in the cottonballs.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Originally, I was going to go the right way with it- from the marks on Liberty's face-but changed it based on the looks of the denticles- "WRONG!"
What exactly are we looking for in the cottonballs to determine the grade?
Thanks for the knowledge!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6381 Posts |
On Dave's photos, I see the difference in field luster between the two coins. On the first (AU) example, notice how the field below Liberty's chin and in front of her face has a hazy, bluish-grey color. Notice how the field surface between the stars at the left obverse edge is free of that haze. The hazy effect is the result of slight wear disrupting the original lustrous surface. The surface between the stars is protected from wear and won't show this disruption at a grade of AU-58. By the time you get down to AU-50 or lower, luster begins to wear away even in the protected areas. The second (mint state) example shows little or no surface quality difference between the exposed and protected field areas. Therefore, it is a mint state coin. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
The cottonballs are the highest point of the obverse. Any indication of wear will show up here first. A properly struck coin will show detial.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,360 |
|