Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

PCGS Labeled Counterfeit 1741 Rouble Sells For $1,100. Why?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 4,256Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Paul Bulgerin's Avatar
United States
3098 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  11:50 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Paul Bulgerin to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This 1741 rouble is in a PCGS "body bag" stating "Do not Holder" and "Counterfeit" and yet it sold for $1,136.

My question is why? Surely bidders couldn't have been confused with the photo.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1741-Russi...6o2m1DU%253D


PCGS-Labeled-Counterfeit-1741-Rouble-Sells-For-$1,100.--Why?
Paul Bulgerin
Edited by Paul Bulgerin
11/27/2019 11:51 am
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  12:36 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The listing is fraudulent, even with the picture.
At least there is a return privilege.
How can 16 bidders make 32 bids on this object? Is there some market for contemporary counterfeits of 1741 rubles?
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24177 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  12:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know anything about this particular coin but some contemporary counterfeits can be quite valuable.
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24177 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  12:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
How can 16 bidders make 32 bids on this object?


Easy. Bidders frequently up their bid in small increments in succession to inflate the bid count in an effort to scare away other bidders. It's a very common tactic on ebay.
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24177 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  12:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I see no intent to deceive here which is required for fraud.
Pillar of the Community
Alpha2814's Avatar
United States
2023 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  12:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alpha2814 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Doesn't this violate ebay's policy against counterfeit coins, even if it's explicitly called out as such?
Pillar of the Community
Australia
3831 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  1:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add gxseries to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
A genuine Ivan iii ruble in VF+ would easily go for 8000+ USD. It's one of those hard coin to fill
My partial coin collection http://www.omnicoin.com/collection/gxseries
My numismatics articles and collection: http://www.gxseries.com/numis/numis_index.htm
Regularly updated at least once a month.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  1:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Bobby
I see a basis for implication of scienter. Describing the coin as genuine while omitting to disclose it as counterfeit is both a mistatement and an omission of material fact. Knowledge would be inputed to the seller from possession of the holder disclosing true facts. Intent would be inputed from carefully omitting known material facts from the description. It is well-established that misrepresentation of the content or meaning of a document, the written facts reflecting the TPG's expert opinion, can support an action for fraud.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  2:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Bobby
I agree with you that 32 bids when there are 16 bidders is unremarkable. I do the incremental up bidding myself. I am just astounded 16 people bid on this coin, unless it has meaningful value as a contemporary counterfeit.
Forum Dad
Learn More...
bobby131313's Avatar
United States
24177 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  2:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add bobby131313 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I've seen contemporary counterfeits go for thousands many times.


Quote:
I see a basis for implication of scienter. Describing the coin as genuine while omitting to disclose it as counterfeit is both a mistatement and an omission of material fact. Knowledge would be inputed to the seller from possession of the holder disclosing true facts. Intent would be inputed from carefully omitting known material facts from the description. It is well-established that misrepresentation of the content or meaning of a document, the written facts reflecting the TPG's expert opinion, can support an action for fraud.


You're grossly overthinking it. Anyone that looks at that listing and doesn't know it's counterfeit is an absolute idiot, moron, or *insert favorite dumb person synonym here*. There is no way any person with a tenth of a brain could look at that listing and think it's real. No fraud here, move along....
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
We'll agree to disagree on our legal opinions and move on.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No contemporary counterfeits were struck this well during that time frame, so forget that line of thinking.

"Counterfeit" in this case means MODERN (numismatic fake). I'd guess that some optimistic, lotto-loving soul is hoping beyond hope that PCGS was wrong.
Valued Member
Learn More...
United States
466 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  3:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sharkman to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
So whoever bought it didn't get what they expected. If they thought it real (listing says it retails for $5,000) it isn't. If they thought it a contemporary counterfeit worth thousands, it isn't. Sure hope they realize and return.
I have bought some of my favorite coins from honorable and reputable ebay sellers. I have also seen things that make me sick. I really have the feeling the seller is looking for a sucker. My dealer has told me it happens.
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
tdziemia's Avatar
United States
7962 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  5:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add tdziemia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I agree with you that 32 bids when there are 16 bidders is unremarkable. I do the incremental up bidding myself. I am just astounded 16 people bid on this coin, unless it has meaningful value as a contemporary counterfeit.


I was curious and took a look, and indeed, there was nothing remarkable about the early bidding (see play-by-play below). The first 13 bidders and 20 bids were done before it hit $175 (probably the ones who would pay that much for what they knew to be a counterfeit). Then there was a single $500 bid, and it looks like it took the next bidder 9 tries to figure out he had to go that high ... and was sniped at the end by the 16th bidder.
What WAS remarkable was that buyers would take a chance on a "5,000 Retail" coin sold by a seller of religious books who has only one other coin sale in his feedback: a recent sale of another Russian counterfeit.
(It looks like someone has decided that selling counterfeit coins is more lucrative than selling bibles).

Play-by-play
- First bidder put in a bid of $69 which registered at starting bid of $0.99.
- Bidder2 (novice with only 34 fb) tries to top this with 6 sequential bids, finally dropping out at $39.
- Bidders 3-9 each place a single bid till the last one tops the first bidders original bid at $77. In the meantime, the first bidder has put in two more new bids ($99 and $129).
- Bidder 10 tops the original bidder at $133, who does not return. Bidder 10 is in turn exceeded by bidders 11 and 12, each entering a single bid to get us up to 12 bidders and 19 bids, at $141 (less than 15% of the final bid).

Now it gets interesting, probably reflecting bidders who missed the fact this coin is a counterfeit.
- Bidder 13 places a bid of $501, but retracts it the next day.
- By the time of the retraction, Bidder 14 enters with a $500 bid.
- Bidder 15 tries 8 times to beat bidder 14, finally surpassing on the 9th try, at $550.
.. only to be outdone 8 hours later by Bidder 16, who places a bid that we can only guess, because even when bidder 15 DOUBLES his previous bid to $1,111, Bidder 16s bid is still high enough to win.


Edited by tdziemia
11/27/2019 7:16 pm
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  5:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not being an expert on Russian Rouble counterfeits I do however observe the following:

1. Its interesting the weight of this piece is a dead match to the listed KM listed weight for a 80% Ag regal at also 25.85 grams.

2. The fabric and edge markings of this coin appear nothing as being a modern Chinese fabrication.

3. I doubt its made of anything but silver as platinum is too early for these Rouble (Ruble) issues as they were started to be minted in 1828. Being of a a debased silver alloy or a combination of base metals and weighing in at exactly the KM listed regal weight is almost an impossibility unless the seller just copied the weight from KM and this piece is of another weight?

Could be a $6000+ gamble by the buyer and/or a mistake by PCGS?

After a 60s look I see no red flags on this piece "not being an 18thC piece? A very unusual E-BAY entry.

John Lorenzo
United States
Non-Russian Coin Collector
Edited by colonialjohn
11/27/2019 5:57 pm
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5177 Posts
 Posted 11/27/2019  6:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add january1may to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Contemporary counterfeit.
1741 ruble.
Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha ha ha hahahahahahahaha...

This type was officially forbidden to own, with harsh penalties if found, for decades after 1741. There's a well-documented case from around 1770 (I forgot the exact date) where a guy accidentally missed one of those rubles getting slipped to him in circulation, and despite extensive defence, still got the full punishment.

This means that, unless we're dealing with the ludicrously rare coincidence of a counterfeiter making the very newest type (already unlikely) and the resulting coin surviving the next few decades (extremely unlikely), any counterfeits of the 1741 ruble would have been deliberate forgeries to fool collectors.
  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 4,256Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.52 seconds to rattle this change. Forums