| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 3,015 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5850 Posts |
I know they are out there (I occasionally see them for sale on ebay at exorbitant prices), but I'm just wondering whether anybody here actually owns what they would consider a "high grade" example of a Classic Head Large Cent (1808-1814). Specifically, one that doesn't have what appears to be a corroded planchet. If so, please share your pictures with the rest of us!
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
5464 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5850 Posts |
Quote: Well, it's high for me anyway. Yeah, I got one of those as well:  
Edited by barryg 07/27/2020 2:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Here's mine (PCGS VF-20). Looks like the 1814 is the date of choice.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
5464 Posts |
Quote: Yeah, I got one of those as well: Yes, I see yours get progressively better thru the years as well.  kanga- I can tell without even looking at the mintage. If it's in my collection, it must be a common date! 
Edited by USSID18 07/27/2020 2:16 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
You all put mine to shame! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5850 Posts |
Quote: You all put mine to shame! Well, if it makes you feel any better, here's the one I originally had before I upgraded to my current example: 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
It actually does. Thank you. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
416 Posts |
Nope. They seem not to exist, at least not without typing some frighteningly high number into ebay.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
I searched for a year trying to find a VF30 or VF35 that was original problem free with no flaws. Many of the Classic heads in VF condition have problems in TPG holders. Most all in VF condition have scratches, pits, cleaning, corrosion, contaminants, color issues, etc. I am sure a problem free VF is out there, but I could not find one. During my search I came across this coin in a PCGS AU50 holder. The coin appears to be a higher grade, but PCGS uses it on coin facts as an AU50 Classic Head grading example.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I know that during this time period a lot of planchets were produced in England and shipped to the US. Porosity was a problem so even a well struck coin could have pitted surfaces. The Half Cents had this problem too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1042 Posts |
It's probably the highlight of my 7070 and it still was a 'problem coin'. PCGS didn't give it a grade, but they did give it a 'smoothed' designation.   I still paid close to $500 for it. I don't think I'll ever get tired of seeing it when I open the album.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
5464 Posts |
You're exactly right about that Slider! This is the one I settled on.  Nice coin scotty!  !
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Guess I can show off a little... I bought this coin from an ebay seller. It was graded MS-60 in a blue ANACS holder. Various dealers who examined it after I bought it thought it showed slight wear. This might be why neither PCGS nor NGC would cross it over at MS-60. However, PCGS did eventually holder it as AU-58. 1814 Plain 4 (S-295).  
Edited by Jaobler 07/27/2020 8:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5850 Posts |
That's what I'm talking about, Jaobler!
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 3,015 |