| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,337 |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95456 Posts |
I recently have gotten my hands on a 1907 O Barber dime, but for the life on me I cannot and it will not fit into a Whitman coin book. The coin is too large. Doing some research and careful measuring, I found that the standard diameter of the dime in question is 17.9mm, however my coin measures at 18.5mm. Stacking several Barber dimes of similar years on edge with the one now in question stands out taller than the rest. I this unusual?
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3638 Posts |
First,  Would you be willing to post photos of the obverse and reverse? Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
  to the CCF!
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
Sure let me give it a try.  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
@dear, first welcome to CCF. Second, thx for posting these pics. What is the weight? If it is normal, I wonder if this coin hasn't just been flattened a little bit, such as is done nowadays to make a Texas Cent.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
I got some photos of 2 coins on a steel ruler to show the differences.  
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
I do not have a scale to measure this accurately yet. (something to buy?) However, the thickness of the coins I compared appear to be the same. Certainly not thin enough to increase the size this much. But I'll find a scale to weigh these coins somewhere.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
I agree that getting weight of it will go a long way toward determining what's going on. Small jewelry/coin scales that read to 1/10 or 1/100 gram can be had pretty cheaply from Amazon and ebay.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: However, the thickness of the coins I compared appear to be the same. You would be surprised how small the decrease in thickness would need to be to create that much of an increase in diameter. When you run the numbers it works out to .05 mm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1307 Posts |
It may be time to upgrade that coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
789 Posts |
Quote: It may be time to upgrade that coin. Or make the hole in the album larger.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188130 Posts |
Quote: Or make the hole in the album larger. 
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
Good news is, is that I ordered a scale that will measure to the .01g. it is expected to be delivered tomorrow. So, I will follow up with more info when it comes in.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
Well the dime weighed in at a whopping 2.41g. Standard weight is 2.5g right? 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
Ok so then this is a little above the nominal value, but the Weight Tolerance for dimes was 0.09 g so I think still within mint specs.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Moderator
  United States
95456 Posts |
Actually, I was hoping it weighed in at a bit more than 2.5g which would explain the extra size in diameter. But it probably just got a bit smashed to explain it. Oh well.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,337 |
|