| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,122 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
Edited by CoinHunter27 02/08/2021 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I figured out how it could of happened. (The creation of that die) But nobody probably want to hear the story.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
191 Posts |
I actually do. I don't post much but I try to read a lot and your explanations of how things happen are fantastic.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34397 Posts |
C'mon @coop--help us learn something today!
I think that an acetone bath is a good idea. Too bad it likely won't do anything for that thumbprint on the rev.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4395 Posts |
Great pickup!
This is listed as a Class III doubled die. Many believe that the doubling on the 4 is from a 1948 date, which has a taller 4.
@Coop Don't be coy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1204 Posts |
Very nice example CH27. Keep up the hunting. Acetone for sure if there is PVC. Got to get it off before it eats into the surface.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5887 Posts |
Thanks all! Acetone dip should be done in the next few days if all goes well.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
Someone restart coop. I think he's caught in some kind of memory leak error. So try a soft boot first and if he doesn't give with the details, unplug him for 10 minutes and see if that works. 
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1527 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Well I thought that the 1948 hub and 1949 hub was similar but different. So I thought they may have used two years on this die. When you look at the first three devices, you can see how they are alike, but yet they are different: Note how the '1's are slightly different, If they are used together, it creates the differences and both at the same time.  Same on the '9's.  Same on the '4's. With the last digit removed, it seems that this could be possible to create the 1949-4/4 DDO. But it is not just the '4' that is affected, all the first three digits are affected. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5887 Posts |
I remember your theory on this! I think it's quite plausible given the evidence. If your theory turns out to be true, would this no longer be classified as a DDO or just classified as a different class of Doubled die. -CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Even if my theory is correct, it would still be a legit DDO. The 1942/1 Mercury dimes and the 1943/2 nickels were a similar situation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5887 Posts |
That's what I thought. It would be neat if your theory is proven correct. Thanks!
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4395 Posts |
VarietyVista, Wexler, and CopperCoins all agree with "Coop's" theory. Listed as a Class III doubled die and notes the 1949/1948 hub.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5887 Posts |
Cool! I hadn't known it was accepted yet. I wonder if the next CPG will include this change or not.
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is how far back this was when I still was working in the sugject: 
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,122 |
|