| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,128 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Tough one. The obverse almost looks like slight circulation friction. The reverse appears to be MS.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Tough call for sure. I'll say MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19165 Posts |
I'll go with a strong MS62.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
average strike for this year. I really want to put this in the MS box but I'm having a difficult time with the obverse doing that. AU55 the reverse might pull it up to 58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
I don't see any wear and the fields don't show any of the darkening that comes from friction. Strike is decent and contact marks are minimal. If the obverse luster is subdued that might drop it from gem status but based on these pictures I'm thinking 65 with a shot at 66. Seems like a very nice Morgan.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Kinda hard to believe that reverse ever saw any circulation!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
58 There appears to be circulation rub on the cheek and neck.
|
|
Valued Member
206 Posts |
That has to be one of the most beautiful Morgan reverses ive ever seen. Looks almost proof like. Shame about the obverse, though.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1775 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
Looks like some one-sided exposure to some handling, but it couldn't have been in actual circulation. Despite the gorgeous reverse, I can't see this higher than a net of MS-63 with all the marks and loss of luster on the obverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36770 Posts |
Looks like an AU-58 slider to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3652 Posts |
Could it be an UNC with cabinet rub? I have to agree, the reverse doesn't show evidence of circulation.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,128 |
|