| Author |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,969 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
Not a new coin, just now in a PCGS holder with TrueViews 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
If doctor burnzy's 1890 is anything to go off of, MS-61 might be what they put on it. Hahaha, but seriously I would probably guess MS-65+.
I'm guessing the line above the eagle is a die clash?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5887 Posts |
Lovely toner. Not much of a grader but based off of what I know about these coins I can't see it going lower than MS63? Hope it came back a nice high grade Grape!
-CH27
Collector of U.S. Coins, Varieties, and Colonial Coinage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
MS63 for me it might get a + for that superb toning! It's a beauty.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1427 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3644 Posts |
Beautiful coin. It looks like a Briggs 3C, which is definitely one of the better struck pairings for 1891. Most 1891 LSQs are mushy strikes with flat stars.
The one hard rim knock and the small obverse rim rash and contact mark on Liberty's left elbow are the only significant contact marks for this coin. Except for that rim knock, the reverse is spectacular. The other marks on the obverse and reverse are clash marks and pitting from the rusted dies. IMHO, the obverse is MS-64 and the reverse is MS-65, for a net technical of MS-64+. I would eye appeal adjust this up +0.5 to MS-65.
That said, PCGS seems to have a hard ceiling at MS-64 for the later LSQs. I've never pulled over 64 for any of them, and I don't think PCGS would grade this over 64. Hope I'm wrong, but I fear I'm not.
I don't see many nice looking 1891 quarters, but this is definitely one of the few.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6384 Posts |
Beautiful coin with lovely original toning. I could see it in an MS-64 holder. However, I observe what looks like light friction on the obverse high points: Liberty's head, breast, right arm and thigh, left hand, and both knees. If luster disruption is as pronounced as what the image shows I'd expect AU-58 is the appropriate grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7030 Posts |
Wow that reverse toning, such a nice collection you're building..  Put me down for 64+/65...Is that a bit of a clash above the date?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
8938 Posts |
Quote: Is that a bit of a clash above the date? Yep! Quote: Wow that reverse toning, such a nice collection you're building.. Thanks the goal has been maximum eye appeal, and I think this coin does that justice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
Wow I will say MS-64 . Love it
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1773 Posts |
Another beauty. I would have said MS-65, but... Quote: If doctor burnzy's 1890 is anything to go off of, MS-61 might be what they put on it. Agree, I still don't get that one.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18663 Posts |
i think the reverse is enough to bring this one in at MS64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Sweet coin. MS64 is my guess.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Good grief, has it not been 48 hours?  ?
Edited by Coinfrog 04/27/2021 7:14 pm
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,969 |