Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1911-1915 44 Candareens China Kiang Kan Province

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,383Next Topic  
Valued Member

Canada
65 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2022  09:16 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add ABuchan to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Hi

Am I correct in saying this is 1911-1915 44 Candareens China Kiang Kan Province? Also Ive looked through 'fakes' for this and there is nothing identical. What are your thoughts? Grading? (Sorry for the plastic in the picture, I'm running out of holders)

Thanks
1911-1915-44-Candareens-China-Kiang-Kan-Province
1911-1915-44-Candareens-China-Kiang-Kan-Province
Pillar of the Community
oriole's Avatar
Canada
5246 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2022  09:48 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add oriole to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The denomination is 1 mace and 44 candareens. I see nothing obviously fake about it. Have you checked for correct weight and magnetism?

Chinese coins were often not struck well or consistently. Given the amount of wear, VF-XF, but possibly it is a weak strike or a worn die.

Try some acetone to get rid of some of the the green, but a lot might be due to bad tarnish due to poor alloys/ high copper content. It might benefit from a very light and quick dip, but that is up to you.
Valued Member
Canada
65 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2022  10:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ABuchan to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks.
Non-Magnetic.
5.1 grams plus or minus
Moderator
Learn More...
Sap's Avatar
Australia
16837 Posts
 Posted 02/24/2022  8:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Sap to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That should be "4.4 candareens", not "44". "1 mace and 4.4 candareens" isn't the "denomination", it's the weight. There were 10 candareens to the mace, and 10 mace to the tael, making the tael slightly heavier than a troy ounce. The denomination is "20 cents" (the Chinese dollar officially weighed 7 Mace 2 candareens; 1 mace 4.4 candareens is one-fifth of this amount), and it is under "20 cents" that you fill find it listed in the catalogues.

Officially, the Chinese 20 cent coin was supposed to weigh 5.44 grams (the literal metric conversion of "1 mace and 4.4 candareens") though many coins in the late Empire and early Republic periods were struck considerably underweight. The green colour also tells me this coin has quite a high copper content, despite being nominally made of at least .900 fine silver. Despite all this, I would still assume your coin is genuine until proven otherwise; fakes of the smaller denominations are far fewer than fakes of the dollar and dollar-sized coins.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36800 Posts
 Posted 03/28/2022  2:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
VF-25 and would probably get a straight grade. You might want to soak this one in some Acetone to get the green junk off.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 03/31/2022  8:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The green/toning are not particularly lovely, but it IS genuine. Kiang-Nan a bit better type... and decent grade.
Pillar of the Community
Princetane's Avatar
4628 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2022  11:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Princetane to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would say goodFine to aVF, check the wear on the Chinese characters.

Quite grubby, but again shows the nice patina of age and I would leave this coin as it is, rather than do anything to modify its surfaces.
Valued Member
Wandering Circle's Avatar
Hong Kong
176 Posts
 Posted 04/14/2022  03:52 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Wandering Circle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This one is specifically minted in 1905 (Y# 143a.12).

https://www.NGCcoin.com/price-guide...duid-1291852
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,383Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.28 seconds to rattle this change. Forums