| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,217 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
137 Posts |
  Ps the obverse is much better irl
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not the best pics. I'll say MS-63RB.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
137 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Looks like fingerprints on it so it is a spender IMHO. John1 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Can go either way, so I'll say AU-63 . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2333 Posts |
Looks a little "cloudy"...maybe the lights? Might get a better reply from the "Modern" crowd...? Have you done anything w/him since you got him...Acetone soak...just asking...? Looks MS...but need a little better pics to be sure... smat
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25087 Posts |
Reverse fields seem a bit "fuzzy"
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19143 Posts |
Given the photos....somewhere between MS61-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
I see some light rub on obverse high points.... AU-58.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15408 Posts |
I'm at high AU - although the out of focus photos can be fooling us. This thread would be best in the Modern Coins forum.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18657 Posts |
fingerprint on obv doesn't help.
AU58 or MS62 doesn't really matter. did you find this coin in circulation? if so thats pretty cool.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19942 Posts |
Definite signs of circulation.
AU-55/58 at best.
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
137 Posts |
I found this in a penny role from my bank
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36723 Posts |
Light circulation, AU-58.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,217 |
|