| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,638 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6406 Posts |
I bought this coin years ago, in an SEGS holder. I crossed it to a PCGS holder, at one step down in grade. What do you think is the proper grade for this better-date Walker?  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7664 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7224 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2357 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15662 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18783 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
EF-40+ surfaces very rough . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
XF45. I could see this in an AU50 holder though. Looks to be some luster left.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
XF45. I could see this in an AU50 holder though. Looks to be some luster left and on a good day AU50
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4477 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6406 Posts |
The coin was graded AU-50 by SEGS when I bought it. It crossed to XF-45 at PCGS and I think it's solid for that grade. Thanks for the comments!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18783 Posts |
i's be happy with a straight 45 from PCGS
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2365 Posts |
I agree with the XF-45 consensus here. There's lots of nice detail where the Walking Lib's are usually worn or smooth. I wonder what happened to the Eagle's breast? It appears slighted dented in the photo. Overall, very nice "Walker"!
|
| |
Replies: 18 / Views: 1,638 |