| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 5,715 |
|
Valued Member
United States
369 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73706 Posts |
I'm sorry, but this quarter is heavily damaged. Extreme PMD. It's a spender. Also, what you're seeing is Pareidolia. I am not seeing anything.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1034 Posts |
Agree with EV. But as a spender, I don't know if the bank will take this one back, L. This one is in bad shape.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
369 Posts |
If you zoom in on the pictures it's much clearer on my phone. This has to be damaged at the mint because of the double printing that's on there plus it's the same exact weight 5.7 as the other quarters it's here and the diameter and thickness is the same if. It's Unique thanks for your input
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34396 Posts |
@thum, it definitely is unique—I agree with that 100%. However, I believe that it is different from newly minted quarters in that it has been heavily damaged. With the amount of metal movement from this damage, it isn't surprising that areas might look vaguely like other things. That is just the nature of Pareidolia. Of course save this quarter if you want. The cost of ownership is low.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
369 Posts |
Lol not like seeing things. I appreciate your thoughts. Just amuze me please, if this coin had obvious dd that you could see, would this still be trash? Eliminating the scratches this could have been damaged at the mint since Dia, thickness and weight are the same ?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
Quote: Thump 1 wrote: Eliminating the scratches this could have been damaged at the mint since Dia, thickness and weight are the same ? Can you elaborate where in the Minting process could happened this? or you want a good narrative for some sort of ebay error?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Really Thump1,you think that is a possible error  John1 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
94795 Posts |
That is a very Mangled quarter - I doubt you could even get it into a pop machine without it jamming up the works.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Just severe damage, believe us!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Lol you can lead a horse to water...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19118 Posts |
At the risk of piling on... Yes, post-strike damage of a blunt force nature. Coin didn't leave the striking chamber in that condition.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1143 Posts |
I know you want this to be some sort of minting error but it is not. Collectively all of us would gladly tell you if it was.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4135 Posts |
If you like weird looking coins then this is good one to keep. You can collect all sorts of coins like this and have a very cool collection so I am all for that. As your collection grows you will see different things on your coins like faces, animals, numbers, letters, ect... all in the wrong places and should not be there. Call your coins as they are, just beautiful damaged coins, nothing more than that. Good luck and have fun with your new venture.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
369 Posts |
All u can tell you us that the dua and thickness is correct and smorh as a baby bottom. A buddy of mine is a machinist and since coins are pressed there could have been a catastrophic issue in comparison the die could have slipped starting compression. Thank you for your time
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
@Thump no. None of that could have happened. It is 100% impossible for a coin to come out of the striking chamber looking like this.
|
| |
Replies: 31 / Views: 5,715 |