I agree that clashes aren't definitive. Not only will the same die have produced coins with and without a clash, but two different dies can end up with very similar clashes. And as you said, the mint may have polished the die in an effort to remove the clash.
I've also been poking around the 1946 $1. There is a reverse clash that can point to the same die being used, but you have to be careful. There are at least two dies with a very similar clash, but George's eye is clashed in different places. Even the SWL variety I'm finding is actually two different dies - one has SWL on both ends of the canoe and the other only on the right.
I started looking into the "hearing aid" obverse clash for the 1948 but it quickly gets confusing. Some coins seem to show it in one image and not another image of the same coin. Which is another problem with using clashes - now you see it, now you don't. I'm also not sure if the 1948 SWL variety is legitimate. My coin appears like a SWL at a certain angle, but at another angle the water lines are still there, just very faint relative to the rest of the water lines. I'm not sure whether this die pair investigation is really worth it. Something like the US
Morgan dollar has had extensive work done with this as the
VAM designations, but I don't think it's ever been done for Canadian dollars, even though the number of dies used is so much smaller.