| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 789 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
343 Posts |
Hey all, here's another from my latest submission, let me know what you think:  |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73799 Posts |
Not an expert on grading, but I'll guess MS-63.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19127 Posts |
Very, very nice. I could go with MS63+...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2132 Posts |
Love the tone on the reverse.  From the PCGS "TrueView" photo, I would give it an MS64... |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18645 Posts |
oh how they love that type of toning at the TPG's typically they bump the coin for that. I think that cheek would hold it to MS63 and I'm betting they would bump it to MS64 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7614 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7005 Posts |
I can't zoom in close enough to see cotton "balls" looks like they might show slight signs of wear...but I'm going with 63+, now I'm wondering if they gave it a PL designation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6381 Posts |
Obverse looks proof-like but the reverse probably doesn't meet P-L criteria. Toning looks natural and attractive overall. The stains on the eagle's breast hurt eye appeal slightly. MS-64 seems fair.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
599 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18645 Posts |
Quote:
I'm wondering if they gave it a PL designation. obv looks PL but the reverse doesn't which could be lighting/glare or even the larger amount of toning. this is one you need to see in hand to determine that. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2132 Posts |
Hmm. For some reason, unlike others here, I don't see any "Proof-Like' on this coin's obverse. Just another PCGS well-prepared photo..  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1510 Posts |
I am at 64 based on the TruViews. Would love to see in-hand pictures
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
343 Posts |
This one sold quickly so "unfortunately" I can't offer any in-hand pics. The best I can do are a couple from the original seller's listing:   And here are the results:  Looks like echidna is the winner, with an honorable mention going to panzaldi for predicting the likely toning bump. Thanks as always everyone, I'll post another later if anyone is interested. Take care all. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18645 Posts |
I hate TV photos. after years of grading coins using these, my personal experience says 'you cant use these to accurately grade a coin' normally they hide a lot of flaws. in this case it enhanced the marks on the cheek skewing everyone's grade here. Look at the reverse photos.  The in hand photos do show an decent MS65 coin. grade is accurate. moral of the story: dont count on TV to accurately grade a coin. - end of PSA - Edited by panzaldi
08/08/2025 08:36 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2132 Posts |
The True View photo even got a few to believe it was " Proof Like"..  |
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 789 |
|
Posted 08/03/2025 9:57 pm
