Another 1,000,000 Ebay Bin

To Wes , who commented about using a 5 instead of an 8...I think what happens is perhaps a simple error ..They reach for 8 but instead they grab a 5 ..they do sort of look the same ..When they realise what they done the simply take back the already punched coins and redo the 5 with an 8 on top....There are other stranger errors like the 1886 quarter series? a 6 over 3, another is 6 over 7 ect.... So back then it was a common occurence to make this type of error..Look at all the double punched dates and letters on the Victorian series...

Hmm just the reason why I posted this, to create dialogue on an possible new and interesting variety, not a yawn to a Canadian collector and it may be a big deal. No! I have not listed anything on ebay for a 1,000,000 once let alone "thousands of times" so you may speak for yourself Scubu all the power to ya!
Now the Canadian 10 cent variety 8/5 Charlton Standard writes "An interesting variety occured through a dating blunder in which a "5" punch was used to repair a defective first 8. This coin sells at a high premium there is an AU55 example listed for auction for $9500. I can not tell for certain but the last A in Canada of the 1870 example listed shows doulbling that is similar to the A on an example of a 1858 8/5 10 cent that I have. Perhaps I will contact the seller and see if he can send a close up of the A or ask the question.
I believe the reason for these forums it to encourage and promote dialogue about the hobby.